From: Scott Robert Ladd <coyote@coyotegulch.com>
To: David Edelsohn <dje@watson.ibm.com>
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 18:03:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <40630546.7080009@coyotegulch.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200403251557.i2PFvgT28342@makai.watson.ibm.com>
David Edelsohn wrote:
> Scott> I know several types of customers (mine) who are using ICC in preference
> Scott> to GCC:
>
> What about ICC versus MSVC or other commercial compilers for
> Windows?
I haven't done any serious Windows development in over two years, so my
information is a tad out-of-date. However, when I *was* doing Windows
work, the company I worked for did use Intel's compiler for a document
analysis and data-mining application, because the code was 10% faster
than MSVC. That was two years ago, of course...
--
Scott Robert Ladd
Coyote Gulch Productions (http://www.coyotegulch.com)
Software Invention for High-Performance Computing
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-03-25 16:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 85+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-03-24 19:04 Bradley Lucier
2004-03-24 19:29 ` Joe Buck
2004-03-24 19:43 ` Bradley Lucier
2004-03-24 19:50 ` Joe Buck
2004-03-24 23:48 ` Toon Moene
2004-03-25 0:02 ` Toon Moene
2004-03-25 0:11 ` Roger Sayle
2004-03-25 5:56 ` Scott Robert Ladd
2004-03-25 6:07 ` Bradley Lucier
2004-03-25 8:18 ` Robert Dewar
2004-03-25 16:15 ` Roger Sayle
2004-03-25 16:36 ` David Edelsohn
2004-03-25 17:09 ` Scott Robert Ladd
2004-03-25 17:47 ` David Edelsohn
2004-03-25 18:03 ` Scott Robert Ladd [this message]
2004-03-26 1:29 ` Toon Moene
2004-03-27 0:23 ` Daniel Egger
2004-03-27 0:50 ` Laurent GUERBY
2004-03-27 0:55 ` Joe Buck
2004-03-27 0:58 ` Laurent GUERBY
2004-03-27 1:16 ` Joe Buck
2004-03-25 5:36 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2004-03-25 8:46 ` Robert Dewar
2004-03-25 5:34 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2004-03-25 7:24 ` Robert Dewar
2004-03-25 8:28 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2004-03-25 18:19 ` Per Abrahamsen
2004-03-24 20:14 ` Paul Koning
2004-03-24 21:00 ` Joe Buck
2004-03-24 22:20 ` Dale Johannesen
2004-03-24 21:07 ` Joseph S. Myers
2004-03-24 21:38 ` Joe Buck
2004-03-24 21:44 ` Joe Buck
2004-03-24 22:49 ` Joseph S. Myers
2004-03-24 22:19 ` Richard Guenther
2004-03-24 22:21 ` Dale Johannesen
2004-03-25 7:29 ` Robert Dewar
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-03-25 16:51 Wolfgang Bangerth
2004-03-15 16:06 Robert Dewar
2004-03-16 8:45 ` Per Abrahamsen
2004-03-17 0:09 ` Robert Dewar
2004-03-17 0:36 ` Scott Robert Ladd
2004-03-17 5:53 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2004-03-17 7:21 ` Robert Dewar
2004-03-17 9:10 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2004-03-21 16:55 ` Robert Dewar
2004-03-23 19:38 ` Joe Buck
2004-03-23 19:58 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2004-03-23 20:49 ` Laurent GUERBY
2004-03-24 8:17 ` Toon Moene
2004-03-24 13:50 ` Robert Dewar
2004-03-24 18:25 ` Paul Koning
2004-03-24 18:51 ` Robert Dewar
2004-03-25 18:18 ` Per Abrahamsen
2004-03-27 1:26 ` Robert Dewar
2004-03-24 18:56 ` Joe Buck
2004-03-24 19:10 ` Robert Dewar
2004-03-24 19:14 ` Richard Guenther
2004-03-24 19:39 ` Paul Brook
2004-03-24 19:45 ` Dave Korn
2004-03-24 20:57 ` Paul Brook
2004-03-25 6:14 ` Robert Dewar
2004-03-25 18:32 ` Scott Robert Ladd
2004-03-27 1:28 ` Robert Dewar
2004-03-17 14:51 ` Per Abrahamsen
2004-03-17 15:18 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2004-03-17 16:05 ` Per Abrahamsen
2004-03-16 12:14 ` Scott Robert Ladd
2004-03-17 0:19 ` Robert Dewar
2004-03-14 23:40 GCC viciously beaten by ICC in " Scott Robert Ladd
2004-03-15 0:12 ` GCC beaten by ICC in stupid " Andrew Pinski
2004-03-15 0:32 ` Paolo Carlini
2004-03-15 1:31 ` Scott Robert Ladd
2004-03-15 2:36 ` Scott Robert Ladd
2004-03-15 11:25 ` Paolo Carlini
2004-03-15 11:31 ` Paolo Carlini
2004-03-15 13:29 ` Zdenek Dvorak
2004-03-15 13:42 ` Paolo Carlini
2004-03-15 13:51 ` Zdenek Dvorak
2004-03-15 13:55 ` Paolo Carlini
2004-03-15 14:00 ` Zdenek Dvorak
2004-03-15 14:05 ` Joseph S. Myers
2004-03-15 14:13 ` Paolo Carlini
2004-03-15 14:18 ` Zdenek Dvorak
2004-03-15 14:29 ` Segher Boessenkool
2004-03-15 14:28 ` Joseph S. Myers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=40630546.7080009@coyotegulch.com \
--to=coyote@coyotegulch.com \
--cc=dje@watson.ibm.com \
--cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).