From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18889 invoked by alias); 25 Mar 2004 16:15:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 18875 invoked from network); 25 Mar 2004 16:15:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ams002.ftl.affinity.com) (216.219.253.98) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 25 Mar 2004 16:15:38 -0000 Received: from coyotegulch.com ([4.4.125.218]) by ams.ftl.affinity.com with ESMTP id <314149-10775>; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 11:14:03 -0500 Message-ID: <40630546.7080009@coyotegulch.com> Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 18:03:00 -0000 From: Scott Robert Ladd User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040312 Debian/1.6-3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Edelsohn CC: gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test! References: <200403251502.i2PF2aT35078@makai.watson.ibm.com> <4062F7FF.5040901@coyotegulch.com> <200403251557.i2PFvgT28342@makai.watson.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <200403251557.i2PFvgT28342@makai.watson.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004-03/txt/msg01479.txt.bz2 David Edelsohn wrote: > Scott> I know several types of customers (mine) who are using ICC in preference > Scott> to GCC: > > What about ICC versus MSVC or other commercial compilers for > Windows? I haven't done any serious Windows development in over two years, so my information is a tad out-of-date. However, when I *was* doing Windows work, the company I worked for did use Intel's compiler for a document analysis and data-mining application, because the code was 10% faster than MSVC. That was two years ago, of course... -- Scott Robert Ladd Coyote Gulch Productions (http://www.coyotegulch.com) Software Invention for High-Performance Computing