Gerald Pfeifer wrote:

>> I can't figure out where to put it, though; it doesn't really fit in 
>> the categories here:
>>
>> http://gcc.gnu.org/cvs.html
>>
>> It's more like the Red Hat release branches than anything else, and I
>> don't see them there either.  What's the policy for such a branch?
>
>
> I don't think we have clearly documented such a policy so far, but I do
> agree that we should, indeed, also list such branches.
>
> How about creating a new section to cvs.html, called "Vendor Branches"
> for example, and documenting your branch there?  Jeff, what do you think?
> Would you mind adding the rh- branches there as well?

Here is what I committed. 

I used the less-controversial term "Distributor" in lieu of "Vendor".

Let me know if there are any problems with that.

Thanks,

-- 
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery, LLC
(916) 791-8304
mark@codesourcery.com