From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1420 invoked by alias); 2 Sep 2004 08:09:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 1412 invoked from network); 2 Sep 2004 08:09:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nemail-g1.xinnet.com) (210.51.172.174) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 2 Sep 2004 08:09:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 96531 invoked from network); 2 Sep 2004 08:09:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?10.0.0.44?) (61.152.127.250) by 0 with SMTP; 2 Sep 2004 08:09:27 -0000 Message-ID: <4136D53F.20701@magima.com.cn> Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2004 08:09:00 -0000 From: Jie Zhang User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.3 (Windows/20040803) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: A question about integer promotion in GCC References: <4136D20A.7010609@magima.com.cn> In-Reply-To: <4136D20A.7010609@magima.com.cn> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004-09/txt/msg00097.txt.bz2 > Maybe it has no performance benefit. But it make the tree dump result > conforming to the standard and improve the readability of the final > assembly output when being compiled using -O2 option. How about your ~~~Here should be -O0. > thoughts? Sorry for inconvenience. regards. -- Jie