From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2542 invoked by alias); 17 Sep 2004 16:06:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 2522 invoked from network); 17 Sep 2004 16:06:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO book.moene.indiv.nluug.nl) (195.109.255.217) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 17 Sep 2004 16:06:48 -0000 Received: from local ([127.0.0.1] helo=moene.indiv.nluug.nl) by book.moene.indiv.nluug.nl with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1C8LL3-00034m-00; Fri, 17 Sep 2004 18:11:57 +0200 Message-ID: <414B0CB8.60208@moene.indiv.nluug.nl> Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2004 16:30:00 -0000 From: Toon Moene Organization: Moene Computational Physics, Maartensdijk, NL User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux ppc; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040414 Debian/1.6-5 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Joseph S. Myers" CC: Giovanni Bajo , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, gcc@gcc.gnu.org, Gerald Pfeifer Subject: Re: RFC: Remove flags -fmove-all-movables and -freduce-all-givs. References: <41433266.5010908@moene.indiv.nluug.nl> <20040911175806.GA10543@redhat.com> <4143E4C2.2020702@moene.indiv.nluug.nl> <020101c49994$5130aad0$8b4e2597@bagio> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004-09/txt/msg01071.txt.bz2 Joseph S. Myers wrote: > Also, the manual still contains the two paragraphs that followed the > description of those options: > > These two options are intended to be removed someday, once > they have helped determine the efficacy of various > approaches to improving loop optimizations. > > Please contact @w{@email{gcc@@gcc.gnu.org}}, and describe how use of > these options affects the performance of your production code. > Examples of code that runs @emph{slower} when these options are > @emph{enabled} are very valuable. Removed with the following patch, which was tested with make dvi: 2004-09-17 Toon Moene * doc/invoke.texi: Remove stray explanation on -freduce-all-givs and -fmove-all-movables. diff -u -r1.538 -r1.539 --- gcc/gcc/doc/invoke.texi 2004/09/17 08:22:43 1.538 +++ gcc/gcc/doc/invoke.texi 2004/09/17 15:51:58 1.539 @@ -4718,15 +4718,6 @@ These options may generate better or worse code; results are highly dependent on the structure of loops within the source code. -These two options are intended to be removed someday, once -they have helped determine the efficacy of various -approaches to improving loop optimizations. - -Please contact @w{@email{gcc@@gcc.gnu.org}}, and describe how use of -these options affects the performance of your production code. -Examples of code that runs @emph{slower} when these options are -@emph{enabled} are very valuable. - @item -fno-peephole @itemx -fno-peephole2 @opindex fno-peephole -- Toon Moene - e-mail: toon@moene.indiv.nluug.nl - phone: +31 346 214290 Saturnushof 14, 3738 XG Maartensdijk, The Netherlands Maintainer, GNU Fortran 77: http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/g77_news.html A maintainer of GNU Fortran 95: http://gcc.gnu.org/fortran/