From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13624 invoked by alias); 18 Sep 2004 20:48:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 13617 invoked from network); 18 Sep 2004 20:48:06 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO smtp.knology.net) (24.214.63.101) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 18 Sep 2004 20:48:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 8770 invoked by uid 0); 18 Sep 2004 20:46:52 -0000 Received: from user-24-96-24-30.knology.net (HELO ?192.168.0.8?) (24.96.24.30) by smtp1.knology.net with SMTP; 18 Sep 2004 20:46:52 -0000 Message-ID: <414C9F04.7040400@coyotegulch.com> Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2004 23:19:00 -0000 From: Scott Robert Ladd User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.3 (X11/20040812) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andi Kleen CC: gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: Comparing Linux C and C++ Compilers: Benchmarks and Analysis References: <414C6C0E.3070503@coyotegulch.com> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.85.0.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004-09/txt/msg01117.txt.bz2 Andi Kleen wrote: > Would it be possible to test with profile feedback too? > > More and more interesting optimizations seem to be only enabled > with that. Intel has profile feedback, too; I suspect I need to do a separate article, explaining what "profile feedback" is, and look at how it affects code generation. -- Scott Robert Ladd site: http://www.coyotegulch.com blog: http://chaoticcoyote.blogspot.com