From: Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com>
To: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr@cs.tamu.edu>
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org, Matt Austern <matt@lafstern.org>,
Nathan Sidwell <nathan@codesourcery.com>,
Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: DR handling for C++
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 21:01:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <414F41F7.40306@codesourcery.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m3isa8wu5h.fsf@merlin.cs.tamu.edu>
Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
>| Unfortunately, I don't have the messages from the original thread, so
>| I'm off starting a new thread.
>|
>| I certainly agree with Matt and Nathan that there's no point in
>| supporting C++98 separately from C++03. I also agree that new
>
>I don't understand this part. Are you implying that there is no point
>for -std=c++98 behaves differently than -std=c++03 (assuming the last
>ever existed?)?
>
>
Yes, that is what I am saying. I do not think it's worthwhile for GNU
C++ to have a C++98 mode that is separate from a C++03 mode. Much of
what has changed in C++03 is clarifications to C++98; in those cases,
it's not possible to know what C++98 should have done with the code,
because the actual C++98 standard did not say.
--
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery, LLC
(916) 791-8304
mark@codesourcery.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-09-20 20:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-09-20 20:44 Mark Mitchell
2004-09-20 20:47 ` Dale Johannesen
2004-09-20 20:55 ` Andrew Pinski
2004-09-20 21:26 ` Dale Johannesen
2004-09-20 21:00 ` Mark Mitchell
2004-09-20 21:04 ` Matt Austern
2004-09-20 21:08 ` Mark Mitchell
2004-09-20 21:36 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2004-09-20 23:42 ` Joseph S. Myers
2004-09-21 8:28 ` Paolo Bonzini
2004-09-21 8:43 ` Paolo Bonzini
2004-09-21 12:39 ` Joseph S. Myers
2004-09-20 20:54 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2004-09-20 21:01 ` Mark Mitchell [this message]
2004-09-20 21:07 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2004-09-20 21:14 ` Mark Mitchell
2004-09-20 21:41 ` Matt Austern
2004-09-20 22:32 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2004-09-20 22:59 ` Mark Mitchell
2004-09-20 23:12 ` Matt Austern
2004-09-20 23:16 ` Mark Mitchell
2004-10-18 9:19 ` Jason Merrill
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=414F41F7.40306@codesourcery.com \
--to=mark@codesourcery.com \
--cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gdr@cs.tamu.edu \
--cc=jason@redhat.com \
--cc=matt@lafstern.org \
--cc=nathan@codesourcery.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).