public inbox for gcc@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "E. Weddington" <ericw@evcohs.com>
To: Dave Korn <dk@artimi.com>
Cc: 'gcc' <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: How to stop GCC from searching for components in --prefix on Windows host?
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 17:56:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4151B5AD.6000005@evcohs.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <NUTMEG3HvoFOAmEaJsw00000027@NUTMEG.CAM.ARTIMI.COM>

Dave Korn wrote:

>  The error is with your users, not gcc!  Heh, well, it's fair enough to say
>that it's a limitation of gcc that it gets hard-coded install paths built
>into it.
>
>  
>
Exactly. Having hard-coded install paths works fine for *nix systems, 
but, ...well everybody knows the general consensus for MS's stuff....

>>There have been some problems where X on the build machine is on a 
>>particular drive, and on the install machine X is on a drive with 
>>removable media, then GCC sometimes craps out and doesn't properly 
>>locate all the components. Is there some way to get GCC to *not* search 
>>for components in the configured prefix, but preserve its 
>>other search rules?
>>    
>>
>
>  How about supplying a dummy path to the --prefix argument when you build
>your releases, something that points to C:\ or whatever, something that's
>pretty much guaranteed to be there on every system you need to support but
>also pretty much guaranteed not to contain any executables that would get in
>the way?
>  
>

I wish I could guarantee that every system is going to have a C:\. In 
practice, most will, but sure as I say it, somebody's going to have a 
system that won't have it.

I'm certainly not afraid to patch this distribution to take out the 
search in --prefix for components as the current searching of PATH (or 
whatever it does after searching --prefix) works just fine. My questions 
would be: is this a sane thing to do (considering the problem)? Where 
would one do this in the code? Is it relatively localized? and... would 
this situation be considered a bug? should I fill out a bug report?

Thanks
Eric

  reply	other threads:[~2004-09-22 17:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-09-22 16:59 E. Weddington
2004-09-22 17:48 ` Dave Korn
2004-09-22 17:56   ` E. Weddington [this message]
2004-09-22 18:34     ` Ian Lance Taylor
2004-09-22 18:37       ` E. Weddington
2004-09-22 18:37         ` Ian Lance Taylor
2004-09-22 18:46           ` E. Weddington
2004-09-22 20:46 ` Geoffrey Keating
2004-09-22 21:56   ` Mark Mitchell
2004-09-22 23:58     ` E. Weddington
2004-09-23  1:29       ` Mark Mitchell
2004-09-23 12:14     ` Dave Korn

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4151B5AD.6000005@evcohs.com \
    --to=ericw@evcohs.com \
    --cc=dk@artimi.com \
    --cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).