From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19760 invoked by alias); 22 Sep 2004 17:56:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 19748 invoked from network); 22 Sep 2004 17:56:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO www.evcohs.com) (66.17.141.91) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 22 Sep 2004 17:56:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 16270 invoked from network); 22 Sep 2004 17:56:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO [10.0.1.12]) (66.180.104.54) by 66.17.141.91 with SMTP; Wed, 22 Sep 2004 17:56:56 +0000 Message-ID: <4151BC87.8070808@evcohs.com> Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 18:46:00 -0000 From: "E. Weddington" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.3 (Windows/20040803) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ian Lance Taylor CC: 'gcc' Subject: Re: How to stop GCC from searching for components in --prefix on Windows host? References: <4151B5AD.6000005@evcohs.com> <4151B9D0.3080503@evcohs.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004-09/txt/msg01302.txt.bz2 Ian Lance Taylor wrote: >"E. Weddington" writes: > > > >>>I don't personally >>>consider this situation to be a bug. >>> >>> >>> >>Would it be reasonable as an enhancement request, though? >> >> > >Sure, but, to be honest, it doesn't sound like something which anybody >who doesn't hvae the problem is particularly likely to pick up and >implement. If you, or somebody else, submits it as a patch, I think >it might well get in. I guess one way to do it would be to add a new >configure option, --disable-prefix or something like. > > Sure, I understand mine is a corner case. I was thinking of adding the enhancement request to bugzilla more as to keep track of the issue. Thanks for the suggestion on where a solution might be implemented. Eric