From: Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com>
To: "E. Weddington" <ericw@evcohs.com>
Cc: Geoffrey Keating <geoffk@geoffk.org>, gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: How to stop GCC from searching for components in --prefix on Windows host?
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 01:29:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4151F29D.9040502@codesourcery.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4151EFFD.3030702@evcohs.com>
E. Weddington wrote:
> Mark Mitchell wrote:
>
>> Geoffrey Keating wrote:
>>
>>> "E. Weddington" <ericw@evcohs.com> writes:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> Hello!
>>>>
>>>> I regularly build GCC for the AVR target on a Windows host
>>>> (--host=mingw32) usually with some configured --prefix=X. The binary
>>>> toolset is redistributed to other users who typically don't install it
>>>> in X. There have been some problems where X on the build machine is on
>>>> a particular drive, and on the install machine X is on a drive with
>>>> removable media, then GCC sometimes craps out and doesn't properly
>>>> locate all the components. Is there some way to get GCC to *not*
>>>> search for components in the configured prefix, but preserve its other
>>>> search rules?
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> GCC should already be looking in places based on its location first.
>>> This is necessary for correct behaviour if you have one version of GCC
>>> installed in $prefix and a different version with the same prefix
>>> installed somewhere else.
>>>
>>>
>> However, it will continue to search in its --prefix location, after
>> its initial search. (And, there are some things for which it
>> searches for which it is normal not to find the thing in the
>> installed location.) The really bad situation is when the prefix
>> location exists, and contains the thing, but it is not the version
>> you want. In practice, we try to avoid this by using paths with
>> "CodeSourcery" in them when building packages, but that's not 100%
>> foolproof.
>>
>> Therefore, I, too, think an option to have GCC not search $(prefix)
>> -- relying purely on its own installed location -- would be a good
>> thing.
>>
>
> Ok, based on this, it's now PR #17621 as an enhancement:
> <http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17621>
>
> BTW, would the IIRC recently taken out --enable-win32-registry=key
> configure flag helped in this situation? Or would it still be
> searching --prefix?
I do not think it would have helped.
--
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery, LLC
(916) 791-8304
mark@codesourcery.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-09-22 21:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-09-22 16:59 E. Weddington
2004-09-22 17:48 ` Dave Korn
2004-09-22 17:56 ` E. Weddington
2004-09-22 18:34 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2004-09-22 18:37 ` E. Weddington
2004-09-22 18:37 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2004-09-22 18:46 ` E. Weddington
2004-09-22 20:46 ` Geoffrey Keating
2004-09-22 21:56 ` Mark Mitchell
2004-09-22 23:58 ` E. Weddington
2004-09-23 1:29 ` Mark Mitchell [this message]
2004-09-23 12:14 ` Dave Korn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4151F29D.9040502@codesourcery.com \
--to=mark@codesourcery.com \
--cc=ericw@evcohs.com \
--cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=geoffk@geoffk.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).