From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10308 invoked by alias); 23 Sep 2004 19:41:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 10290 invoked from network); 23 Sep 2004 19:41:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.codesourcery.com) (65.74.133.10) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 23 Sep 2004 19:41:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 20263 invoked from network); 23 Sep 2004 19:41:35 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO ?192.168.0.105?) (mitchell@127.0.0.1) by mail.codesourcery.com with SMTP; 23 Sep 2004 19:41:35 -0000 Message-ID: <415326E9.7010407@codesourcery.com> Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 22:41:00 -0000 From: Mark Mitchell Organization: CodeSourcery, LLC User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040616 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Joseph S. Myers" CC: gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: GCC Release Status (2004-09-21) References: <41510EA1.2090402@codesourcery.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004-09/txt/msg01355.txt.bz2 Joseph S. Myers wrote: >On Tue, 21 Sep 2004, Mark Mitchell wrote: > > > >>Exactly when we'll create a release branch will depend on getting >>these projects merged in, the Objective-C++ changes finished, and >>getting some of the more important defects fixed. I'd hope for some >>time in October. >> >> > >So Stage 3 is expected to be rather shorter than normal? > > No, I'm afraid I said October when I meant November. Then again, I wouldn't hold up making a release branch if it really looked like we had all our ducks in a row. -- Mark Mitchell CodeSourcery, LLC (916) 791-8304 mark@codesourcery.com