From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26615 invoked by alias); 2 Oct 2004 14:31:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 26545 invoked from network); 2 Oct 2004 14:31:02 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nile.gnat.com) (205.232.38.5) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 2 Oct 2004 14:31:02 -0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nile.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10FCCF2905; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 10:31:02 -0400 (EDT) Received: from nile.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (nile.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 00283-01-8; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 10:31:01 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [205.232.38.103] (taconic.gnat.com [205.232.38.103]) by nile.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1DC0F28F9; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 10:31:01 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <415EBB91.3030503@gnat.com> Date: Sun, 03 Oct 2004 06:51:00 -0000 From: Robert Dewar User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (Windows/20040913) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Daniel Lundqvist Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: C++ and Ada. References: <415E9A68.5050009@malarhojden.nu> <415E9F37.8000504@gnat.com> <415EB864.2090307@malarhojden.nu> In-Reply-To: <415EB864.2090307@malarhojden.nu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at nile.gnat.com X-SW-Source: 2004-10/txt/msg00070.txt.bz2 Daniel Lundqvist wrote: > If I import it as a normal ADA record I can't use constructors,right? Right. By the way ADA is the American Dental Assocation (or any one of several other acronyms, including Americans with Disabilities Act -- there is a fun poster of Clinton saying "The president wants your help with ADA". The language is called Ada, after Lord Byron's daughter, Ada, who is given credit for being the first programmer. > And there is no way of using CPP_Constructor with a non tagged type? No there is not > Any timeline on this? not yet > With this new pragma support will there be any work to eliminate the > need for manually specifying C++ mangled symbol names? If that is possible. We don't have any plans, these pragmas are intended to be used with a binding generator, no free software binding generator is available yet. > > Is this document available anywhere? Would be interesting to read of > what will come. We will post it here when it is available :-) > Thanks in advance, > Daniel.