From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1343 invoked by alias); 18 Nov 2004 00:46:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 1315 invoked from network); 18 Nov 2004 00:46:21 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.codesourcery.com) (65.74.133.9) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 18 Nov 2004 00:46:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 13976 invoked from network); 18 Nov 2004 00:46:21 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO ?192.168.0.101?) (mitchell@127.0.0.1) by mail.codesourcery.com with SMTP; 18 Nov 2004 00:46:21 -0000 Message-ID: <419BF0D6.40008@codesourcery.com> Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 00:53:00 -0000 From: Mark Mitchell Organization: CodeSourcery, LLC User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.9 (Windows/20041103) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mike Stump CC: Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf , gcc@gcc.gnu.org, discuss-gnustep@gnu.org Subject: Re: Is ObjC++ still in time for 4.0? References: <442C1616-387F-11D9-9815-0030654C2998@hamburg.de> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004-11/txt/msg00596.txt.bz2 Mike Stump wrote: > Mark, I suppose we can discuss when that drop dead date is. Has it > already passed? No, but only because we're seeing enough other problems. I've tried twice in the last week to put together a status report, but I keep getting overwhelmed by the current state of Bugzilla. I really will get to that soon, I promise. I would still like to see this happen for 4.0. I think Joseph summarized the issues well. -- Mark Mitchell CodeSourcery, LLC mark@codesourcery.com (916) 791-8304