From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2459 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2004 09:43:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 2422 invoked from network); 23 Nov 2004 09:43:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.codesourcery.com) (65.74.133.9) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 23 Nov 2004 09:43:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 17655 invoked from network); 23 Nov 2004 09:43:12 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO ?192.168.189.167?) (nathan@127.0.0.1) by mail.codesourcery.com with SMTP; 23 Nov 2004 09:43:12 -0000 Message-ID: <41A30629.4000003@codesourcery.com> Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 11:46:00 -0000 From: Nathan Sidwell Organization: Codesourcery LLC User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20040913 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mark Mitchell CC: Diego Novillo , Kazu Hirata , "gcc@gcc.gnu.org" Subject: Re: Mainline in regression-fix mode after Thanksgiving References: <200411230026.iAN0QqeO005220@sirius.codesourcery.com> <20041122.201559.34387675.kazu@cs.umass.edu> <1101172833.24001.52.camel@localhost.localdomain> <41A291BF.6040007@codesourcery.com> In-Reply-To: <41A291BF.6040007@codesourcery.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004-11/txt/msg00800.txt.bz2 Mark Mitchell wrote: > Yes, compile-time regressions are OK -- but let's be circumspect. For > example, Nathan's bitmap patches are probably more aggressive than I'd > like after this goes into effect. Things that are less far-reaching and I concur that my most recent bitmap patch would not be appropriate after the freeze. I do have some small cleanups, confined to bitmap.c, in mind that I would consider OK :) nathan -- Nathan Sidwell :: http://www.codesourcery.com :: CodeSourcery LLC nathan@codesourcery.com :: http://www.planetfall.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk