From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22257 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2004 04:20:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 22190 invoked from network); 26 Nov 2004 04:20:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO rwcrmhc11.comcast.net) (204.127.198.35) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 26 Nov 2004 04:20:03 -0000 Received: from [192.168.123.1] (c-24-126-73-164.we.client2.attbi.com[24.126.73.164]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc11) with ESMTP id <2004112604200201300l3hvre>; Fri, 26 Nov 2004 04:20:02 +0000 Message-ID: <41A6A0DB.401@kegel.com> Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2004 05:32:00 -0000 From: Dan Kegel User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20040913 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Joseph S. Myers" CC: law@redhat.com, GCC Mailing List , bastian@kde.org Subject: Re: profile-driven optimization and the linker? References: <41A620F5.5040209@kegel.com> <1101412168.13475.19.camel@localhost.localdomain> <41A63996.1020407@kegel.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004-11/txt/msg01011.txt.bz2 Joseph S. Myers wrote: > On Thu, 25 Nov 2004, Dan Kegel wrote: > > >>I may take a whack at this in my copious free time. >>Are any such hacks online, or shall I just start from scratch? > > > You could try to get hold of the semi-mythical "GNU Rope". (Most of the > online references are people asking what happened to it, e.g. > .) I just emailed Nat, but I have little hope of succeeding where others have failed. And then there's SCO's "fur", said to have been released under a BSD license (http://www.aplawrence.com/News/sconews0051.html). Anyone have a copy of that? - Dan -- Trying to get a job as a c++ developer? See http://kegel.com/academy/getting-hired.html