public inbox for gcc@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vladius <boxforsr@inbox.ru>
To: Per Bothner <per@bothner.com>
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: Will someone answear me?
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2005 12:37:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <41E3C428.4060709@inbox.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <41E3568E.5000000@bothner.com>



Per Bothner wrote:

> Vladius wrote:
>
>>    Excuse me, everybody. I'm not trying to persuade anyone, but will 
>> someone from moderators or GCC maintainers answear me?
>
>
> I suspect most people doesn't really see the need for a new logo.
> However, the SC is likely to follow if there is consesnsus on the list.

    I do think that a new logo has to take its place =)

>> I'm trying to redesign GCC logotype, and I don't think it is a good 
>> idea to continue, because few people respond and none of "officials" 
>> did ("New GCC logotype version 1.6" topic.). It would be very nice of 
>> You to clarify, that You don't like it at all or probably have other 
>> things to do. That could stop me spending my time "flooding" the 
>> mail-list, and drawing. d:-)
>
>
> My personal comments on:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2005-01/msg00430.html
>
> + I don't see anything specifically relating to Gcc.

    You should check out a newer version. It is titled "GCC".

> * It loks very dark, and with poor contrast.

    Seems that I completly don't understand You. It looks OK here. I 
will see what can be made if some more people will post the same issue.

> * It doesn't like as "friendly" or "happy" as the currrent logo.

    I don't understand either.

> * It is more detailed and realistic than the current logo, but
> it's not clear if that's an advantage.

    Maybe.

> * The horns look strange - like a turban.

    You should check out real blue gnu look. You can see it on discovery 
channel site, for example.

> I.e. don't think this is very promising.  And I don't have
> time or inclination to follow up on this.

    Anyway, I have to thank You for Your comments, since that is what I 
wanted - to see if You like it or not.

      parent reply	other threads:[~2005-01-11 12:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-01-08 16:03 Vladius
2005-01-11  5:40 ` Per Bothner
2005-01-11  5:46   ` Kaveh R. Ghazi
2005-01-11  7:15     ` Joe Buck
2005-01-11 12:55       ` Vladius
2005-01-11 14:24         ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2005-01-11 14:30           ` Vladius
2005-01-11 14:52             ` Robert Dewar
2005-01-13 21:32       ` Gerald Pfeifer
2005-01-13 22:41         ` Vladius
2005-01-11 12:51     ` Vladius
2005-01-11 14:10     ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2005-01-11 12:37   ` Vladius [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=41E3C428.4060709@inbox.ru \
    --to=boxforsr@inbox.ru \
    --cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=per@bothner.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).