From: Vladius <boxforsr@inbox.ru>
To: Per Bothner <per@bothner.com>
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: Will someone answear me?
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2005 12:37:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <41E3C428.4060709@inbox.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <41E3568E.5000000@bothner.com>
Per Bothner wrote:
> Vladius wrote:
>
>> Excuse me, everybody. I'm not trying to persuade anyone, but will
>> someone from moderators or GCC maintainers answear me?
>
>
> I suspect most people doesn't really see the need for a new logo.
> However, the SC is likely to follow if there is consesnsus on the list.
I do think that a new logo has to take its place =)
>> I'm trying to redesign GCC logotype, and I don't think it is a good
>> idea to continue, because few people respond and none of "officials"
>> did ("New GCC logotype version 1.6" topic.). It would be very nice of
>> You to clarify, that You don't like it at all or probably have other
>> things to do. That could stop me spending my time "flooding" the
>> mail-list, and drawing. d:-)
>
>
> My personal comments on:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2005-01/msg00430.html
>
> + I don't see anything specifically relating to Gcc.
You should check out a newer version. It is titled "GCC".
> * It loks very dark, and with poor contrast.
Seems that I completly don't understand You. It looks OK here. I
will see what can be made if some more people will post the same issue.
> * It doesn't like as "friendly" or "happy" as the currrent logo.
I don't understand either.
> * It is more detailed and realistic than the current logo, but
> it's not clear if that's an advantage.
Maybe.
> * The horns look strange - like a turban.
You should check out real blue gnu look. You can see it on discovery
channel site, for example.
> I.e. don't think this is very promising. And I don't have
> time or inclination to follow up on this.
Anyway, I have to thank You for Your comments, since that is what I
wanted - to see if You like it or not.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-01-11 12:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-01-08 16:03 Vladius
2005-01-11 5:40 ` Per Bothner
2005-01-11 5:46 ` Kaveh R. Ghazi
2005-01-11 7:15 ` Joe Buck
2005-01-11 12:55 ` Vladius
2005-01-11 14:24 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2005-01-11 14:30 ` Vladius
2005-01-11 14:52 ` Robert Dewar
2005-01-13 21:32 ` Gerald Pfeifer
2005-01-13 22:41 ` Vladius
2005-01-11 12:51 ` Vladius
2005-01-11 14:10 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2005-01-11 12:37 ` Vladius [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=41E3C428.4060709@inbox.ru \
--to=boxforsr@inbox.ru \
--cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=per@bothner.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).