From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6057 invoked by alias); 11 Jan 2005 12:28:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 6003 invoked from network); 11 Jan 2005 12:28:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx2.mail.ru) (194.67.23.122) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 11 Jan 2005 12:28:53 -0000 Received: from [83.237.194.11] (port=1191 helo=[127.0.0.1]) by mx2.mail.ru with esmtp id 1CoL8m-000Gb7-00; Tue, 11 Jan 2005 15:28:53 +0300 Message-ID: <41E3C685.8080909@inbox.ru> Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2005 12:51:00 -0000 From: Vladius User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.9 (Windows/20041103) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Kaveh R. Ghazi" CC: gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: Will someone answear me? References: <41DFB2C5.80309@inbox.ru> <41E3568E.5000000@bothner.com> <200501110506.j0B56AJ4016155@caip.rutgers.edu> In-Reply-To: <200501110506.j0B56AJ4016155@caip.rutgers.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 0502-0, 10.01.2005), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Spam: Not detected X-SW-Source: 2005-01/txt/msg00608.txt.bz2 Kaveh R. Ghazi wrote: > > > Excuse me, everybody. I'm not trying to persuade anyone, but will > > > someone from moderators or GCC maintainers answear me? > > > > I suspect most people doesn't really see the need for a new logo. > > However, the SC is likely to follow if there is consesnsus on the > > list. > > > > > I'm trying to redesign GCC logotype, and I don't think it is a good > > > idea to continue, because few people respond and none of "officials" > > > did ("New GCC logotype version 1.6" topic.). It would be very nice of > > > You to clarify, that You don't like it at all or probably have other > > > things to do. That could stop me spending my time "flooding" the > > > mail-list, and drawing. d:-) > > >In addition to Per's comments, you should note the current logo >references the historical rift in the GCC community and its eventual >reunification. (The GNU popping out of the egg.) I myself and >perhaps others who went through that period with GCC, feel the logo >commemorates the difficulties we resolved and signifies a rebirth for >the compiler. > > I respect that fact, that You had overcome many difficulties, but according to You - there is nothing that can be changed at all. We all have our past behind our shoulders, but that doesn't mean, that we can't turn ourselves to future and something new. >So while I respect your attempts at artistic expression, personally I >like the logo just the way it is. > > This is a better one =). Yes, I see. I will notice that. Thank You for Your comments.