From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16334 invoked by alias); 26 Jul 2002 23:17:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 16327 invoked from network); 26 Jul 2002 23:17:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO gandalf.codesourcery.com) (66.60.148.227) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 26 Jul 2002 23:17:15 -0000 Received: from gandalf.codesourcery.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by gandalf.codesourcery.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g6QNBPQ12992; Fri, 26 Jul 2002 16:11:25 -0700 Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2002 01:30:00 -0000 From: Mark Mitchell To: Joe Buck cc: "gcc@gcc.gnu.org" Subject: Re: GCC 3.2 Message-ID: <42940000.1027725085@gandalf.codesourcery.com> In-Reply-To: <200207262309.QAA24459@atrus.synopsys.com> References: <200207262309.QAA24459@atrus.synopsys.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-SW-Source: 2002-07/txt/msg01296.txt.bz2 --On Friday, July 26, 2002 04:09:35 PM -0700 Joe Buck wrote: > Mark writes: >> I have created the GCC 3.2 branch. > > Cool, and congrats on doing a great job (as usual) with 3.1.1. > Thanks -- and thanks again for your help with the release notes. > The http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-3.1/changes.html page says that we will remove > -traditional in 3.2; clearly this deprecation has moved to 3.3, right? (I > don't see any reason for making the quick release of 3.2 more > complicated). Yes. > Should the web page be updated? (I haven't spotted any other 3.2 mentions > that need fixing, but that doesn't mean there aren't any). Yes. I fixed that. If there are others, they should be fixed too; 3.2 is just 3.1.1 + ABI patches, and 3.2.1 is just what would have been 3.1.2 + ABI patches. Thanks, -- Mark Mitchell mark@codesourcery.com CodeSourcery, LLC http://www.codesourcery.com