From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-116188-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 13244 invoked by alias); 20 Jun 2005 14:25:36 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 13144 invoked by uid 22791); 20 Jun 2005 14:25:21 -0000
Received: from smtpout01-04.mesa1.secureserver.net (HELO smtpout01-04.mesa1.secureserver.net) (64.202.165.79)
    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with SMTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 14:25:21 +0000
Received: (qmail 22394 invoked from network); 20 Jun 2005 14:25:19 -0000
Received: from unknown (24.96.113.81)
  by smtpout01-04.mesa1.secureserver.net (64.202.165.79) with ESMTP; 20 Jun 2005 14:25:19 -0000
Message-ID: <42B6D192.7000203@coyotegulch.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 14:25:00 -0000
From: Scott Robert Ladd <scott.ladd@coyotegulch.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050512)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Sergei Organov <osv@topconrd.ru>
CC:  gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: How to replace -O1 with corresponding -f's?
References: <878y159mhr.fsf@osv.topcon.com>
In-Reply-To: <878y159mhr.fsf@osv.topcon.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SW-Source: 2005-06/txt/msg00899.txt.bz2

Sergei Organov wrote:
> Using gcc compiled from gcc-4_0-branch, in an attempt to see which
> particular optimization option makes my test case to be mis-optimized,

This sort of problem is exactly what my Acovea program was designed for;
it will identify the pessimistic option by analyzing GCC's compilation
of your code.

    http://acovea.coyotegulch.com

..Scott