public inbox for gcc@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Robert Dewar <dewar@adacore.com>
To: Steven Bosscher <stevenb@suse.de>
Cc: Daniel Berlin <dberlin@dberlin.org>,
	 Ulrich Weigand <uweigand@de.ibm.com>,
	gcc@gcc.gnu.org, Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com>,
	 Michael Veksler <VEKSLER@il.ibm.com>,
	Paul Koning <pkoning@equallogic.com>,
	 gdr@integrable-solutions.net,  nathan@codesourcery.com
Subject: Re: Do C++ signed types have modulo semantics?
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2005 18:45:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <42C2EC27.3010602@adacore.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200506292032.16423.stevenb@suse.de>

Steven Bosscher wrote:
> On Wednesday 29 June 2005 20:01, Daniel Berlin wrote:
> 
>>So i would advise anyone arguing against turning on -fwrapv simply
>>because it doesn't seem to hurt us at O2.
> 
> 
> wtf, "doesn't seem to hurt us at -O2".  Look again at the 64 bits
> numbers!  Losing 5% on the fp benchmarks is a serious regression.
> Even without exercising the heavy-ammo loop optimizers, -fwrapv is
> a serious performance-hurter.

Still these figures are very interesting for Ada, where I am afraid
the kludge we do in the front end for required overflow checking is
much more expensive than these figures indicate. Of course this will
be *highly* target dependent.

  reply	other threads:[~2005-06-29 18:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-06-27  5:09 Michael Veksler
2005-06-27 13:02 ` Nathan Sidwell
2005-06-27 14:10   ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2005-06-27 14:36     ` Nathan Sidwell
2005-06-27 14:47       ` Paul Koning
2005-06-27 15:21         ` Michael Veksler
2005-06-28  3:06           ` Mark Mitchell
2005-06-28  3:49             ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2005-06-28 10:08             ` Robert Dewar
2005-06-28 11:19               ` Steven Bosscher
2005-06-28 12:03                 ` Ulrich Weigand
2005-06-28 12:09                   ` Steven Bosscher
2005-06-29 16:46                     ` Steven Bosscher
2005-06-29 18:01                       ` Daniel Berlin
2005-06-29 18:32                         ` Steven Bosscher
2005-06-29 18:45                           ` Robert Dewar [this message]
2005-06-29 19:13                         ` Nicholas Nethercote
2005-06-28 12:16                 ` Paul Koning
2005-06-28 12:30                   ` Steven Bosscher
2005-06-28 12:35                     ` Michael Veksler
2005-06-28 12:38                       ` Steven Bosscher
2005-06-28 16:54             ` Joe Buck
2005-06-28 17:02               ` Mark Mitchell
2005-06-28 17:08                 ` Daniel Berlin
2005-06-28 18:12                   ` Mark Mitchell
2005-06-28 17:46                 ` Theodore Papadopoulo
2005-06-27 15:17       ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2005-06-30 20:53         ` Kai Henningsen
2005-06-27 14:39 Morten Welinder
2005-06-27 15:21 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
     [not found] <OF0E4366CA.5D54868B-ON4325702E.0036D351-4325702E.003973C5@il.ibm.com>
     [not found] ` <m3k6keeibo.fsf@uniton.integrable-solutions.net>
2005-06-28 13:29   ` Nathan Sidwell
2005-06-28 13:59     ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2005-06-28 14:05       ` Andrew Pinski
2005-06-28 14:13         ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2005-06-28 15:30           ` Michael Veksler
2005-06-28 15:49             ` Nathan Sidwell
2005-06-28 15:58               ` Michael Veksler
2005-06-28 16:07                 ` Andrew Pinski
2005-06-28 16:39                 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2005-06-28 15:55             ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2005-06-28 16:47               ` Joseph S. Myers
2005-06-28 17:58                 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2005-06-28 14:05       ` Nathan Sidwell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=42C2EC27.3010602@adacore.com \
    --to=dewar@adacore.com \
    --cc=VEKSLER@il.ibm.com \
    --cc=dberlin@dberlin.org \
    --cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gdr@integrable-solutions.net \
    --cc=mark@codesourcery.com \
    --cc=nathan@codesourcery.com \
    --cc=pkoning@equallogic.com \
    --cc=stevenb@suse.de \
    --cc=uweigand@de.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).