From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 580 invoked by alias); 5 Jul 2005 20:22:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 357 invoked by uid 22791); 5 Jul 2005 20:22:19 -0000 Received: from mx2.suse.de (HELO mx2.suse.de) (195.135.220.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Jul 2005 20:22:19 +0000 Received: from Relay2.suse.de (mail2.suse.de [195.135.221.8]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D98F1D1E5; Tue, 5 Jul 2005 22:22:17 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <42CAEC2A.2070500@suse.de> Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2005 20:22:00 -0000 From: Paolo Carlini User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.7) Gecko/20050414 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Michael Veksler Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org, Gabriel Dos Reis Subject: Re: tr1::unordered_set bizarre rounding behavior (x86) References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2005-07/txt/msg00194.txt.bz2 Michael Veksler wrote: >Paolo Carlini wrote on 05/07/2005 19:05:40: > > >>However, sorry, as a matter of politeness, in my opinion expressions >>like "absurdity" or "very bad way" are much better accepted if >>accompanied by corresponding constructive contributions. Or, >>alternately, just avoid such extreme statements and offer analyses >>preferring technical terms and citations, as you basically just did, >>thanks about that. >> >> >No offense meant, it's only due to cultural differences... >I'll keep in mind to avoid such words, so that nobody is offended. > > No problem ;) >Unfortunately, the text is much more dry and boring that way. > > Not necessarily: there are many different ways to deal with that "serious" ;) problem: for instance you can make a funny link to a movie, music you like, no? ;) Paolo.