* What's the best way of including extra files for gcc lib dir?
@ 2005-07-17 23:27 Kean Johnston
2005-07-18 5:45 ` Ian Lance Taylor
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Kean Johnston @ 2005-07-17 23:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc
Hi All,
What is the best way of including target-specific files in the
version-specific gcc library directory? I need to include a
file that will be referenced from LINK_SPEC as "gcc.map%s".
IE, in the same place the startup files are located. So
really I need to know two things:
1) How to I persuade the GCC makefile to install it, and
2) Whats the best place to put it in the source tree?
Bear inmind this must be available during bootstrapping too.
I suspect it may require additions to "extra_parts" in config.gcc,
and then suitable rules for creating it in the t-* fragment.
Is this correct? Is it acceptable for that t-* fragment to
do something like:
gcc.map: $(srcdir)/config/i386/gcc.map
-rm -f gcc.map
-cp -f $(srcdir)/config/i386/gcc.map $@
Any help / advice would be greatly appreciated.
Kean
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: What's the best way of including extra files for gcc lib dir?
2005-07-17 23:27 What's the best way of including extra files for gcc lib dir? Kean Johnston
@ 2005-07-18 5:45 ` Ian Lance Taylor
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Ian Lance Taylor @ 2005-07-18 5:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: jkj; +Cc: gcc
Kean Johnston <jkj@sco.com> writes:
> What is the best way of including target-specific files in the
> version-specific gcc library directory? I need to include a
> file that will be referenced from LINK_SPEC as "gcc.map%s".
> IE, in the same place the startup files are located. So
> really I need to know two things:
> 1) How to I persuade the GCC makefile to install it, and
Put it in extra_parts in config.gcc.
> 2) Whats the best place to put it in the source tree?
In the config/CPU directory.
> I suspect it may require additions to "extra_parts" in config.gcc,
> and then suitable rules for creating it in the t-* fragment.
> Is this correct? Is it acceptable for that t-* fragment to
> do something like:
>
> gcc.map: $(srcdir)/config/i386/gcc.map
> -rm -f gcc.map
> -cp -f $(srcdir)/config/i386/gcc.map $@
Yes.
Ian
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-07-18 5:45 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-07-17 23:27 What's the best way of including extra files for gcc lib dir? Kean Johnston
2005-07-18 5:45 ` Ian Lance Taylor
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).