public inbox for gcc@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf <lars.sonchocky-helldorf@hamburg.de>
To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: discuss-gnustep@gnu.org
Subject: Is ObjC++ still in time for 4.0?
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2004 10:28:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <442C1616-387F-11D9-9815-0030654C2998@hamburg.de> (raw)

Hi,

I wanted to ask what the current status of Objective-C++ for mainline 
gcc is. While there have been a lot of activity on the gcc-patches and 
gcc-cvs lists several month ago it is now relatively silent regarding 
this topic. Is all the work done now or did the release plan slip 
backwards (to 4.1 or whatever)?

regards, Lars

             reply	other threads:[~2004-11-17  9:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-11-17 10:28 Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf [this message]
2004-11-17 20:51 ` Mike Stump
2004-11-17 21:53   ` Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf
2004-11-17 22:28     ` Ziemowit Laski
2004-11-17 22:54     ` Gregory John Casamento
2004-11-17 23:02       ` Nicolas Roard
2004-11-17 23:31         ` Joseph S. Myers
2004-11-17 23:17       ` Phil Edwards
2004-11-17 23:50         ` Alex Perez
2004-11-18  0:06           ` Joe Buck
2004-11-18  0:35         ` Gregory John Casamento
2004-11-18  0:46           ` Gregory John Casamento
2004-11-18  0:53   ` Mark Mitchell
2004-11-18  1:18     ` Giovanni Bajo
2004-11-18 23:22   ` Geoffrey Keating
2004-11-18 23:28     ` Gregory John Casamento
2004-11-19  0:57     ` Ziemowit Laski
2004-11-19  1:26       ` Rogelio Serrano
2004-11-19  1:41       ` Helge Hess
2004-11-19  4:26         ` Gregory John Casamento
2004-11-19  5:49         ` Matt Austern
2004-11-19  6:42           ` Ziemowit Laski
2004-11-19  7:52             ` Phil Edwards
2004-11-22  3:22               ` Chuck Robey
2004-11-22 10:07                 ` Phil Edwards
2004-11-22 10:31                 ` Ranjit Mathew
2004-11-19 19:44           ` Dale Johannesen
2004-11-19 20:04             ` Dan Grillo
2004-11-19 20:08             ` Dave Korn
2004-11-19 13:31 Richard Kenner
2004-11-19 20:22 ` Ziemowit Laski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=442C1616-387F-11D9-9815-0030654C2998@hamburg.de \
    --to=lars.sonchocky-helldorf@hamburg.de \
    --cc=discuss-gnustep@gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).