From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-137503-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 14544 invoked by alias); 20 May 2007 14:03:26 -0000
Received: (qmail 14534 invoked by uid 22791); 20 May 2007 14:03:23 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from smtp.lu.unisi.ch (HELO smtp.lu.unisi.ch) (195.176.178.41)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Sun, 20 May 2007 14:03:19 +0000
Received: from mail.lu.unisi.ch ([195.176.178.40]) by smtp.lu.unisi.ch with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); 	 Sun, 20 May 2007 16:04:52 +0200
Received: from scientist.local ([213.140.22.65] RDNS failed) by mail.lu.unisi.ch over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); 	 Sun, 20 May 2007 16:02:34 +0200
Message-ID: <4650551F.7040800@lu.unisi.ch>
Date: Sun, 20 May 2007 14:09:00 -0000
From: Paolo Bonzini <paolo.bonzini@lu.unisi.ch>
Reply-To:  bonzini@gnu.org
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (Macintosh/20070326)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Bernardo Innocenti <bernie@codewiz.org>
CC: Mike Stump <mrs@apple.com>, GCC Development <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: 4.3 release plan
References: <464E03AC.8080007@codewiz.org> <DDF5900F-5AAF-4287-85BE-6248901C9F16@apple.com> <464E1E81.20703@codewiz.org> <8C344B92-47E5-470B-BE4F-1C9C489EF595@apple.com> <464EB224.8070009@gnu.org> <464F7DF2.9090204@codewiz.org>
In-Reply-To: <464F7DF2.9090204@codewiz.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2007-05/txt/msg00489.txt.bz2


>> I got the second one too.  Italians must be good at acronyms. :-)
> 
> IMBGAA!
> ...BTTOWWTD!!!

PBTMAICFOTL (Probably better than me as I cannot figure out the latter).

>> On the other hand, it may mean that we can skip stage2 altogether, since 
>> we had stage2 during stage1 for 4.3...
> 
> I'm definitely for short release cycles, so I'd generally
> second this.  But in the wiki I see several stage1 projects
> still waiting to be merged, as Steven Bosscher said
> 
> Would these have to go in now or later in 4.4?

I would propose waiting for these to be merged, and then moving directly 
to bug-fixing stage3.  We've effectively been in stage2 for 4 months.

Paolo