From: Jie Zhang <jzhang918@gmail.com>
To: Bernd Schmidt <bernds_cb1@t-online.de>,
Jie Zhang <jzhang918@gmail.com>,
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: Link tests after GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 14:11:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <46EFDC9D.8060604@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070918133330.GA4693@caradoc.them.org>
Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 03:27:18PM +0200, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
>> Jie Zhang wrote:
>>> Bernd Schmidt wrote:
>>>> Jie Zhang wrote:
>>>>> But by design if gcc_no_link = no, link tests should be avoided.
>>>> ??? I would have thought gcc_no_link = yes means link tests are avoided.
>>>>
>>> Oops, I meant gcc_no_link = yes.
>> Stupid double negatives. Okay, so then your problem is that gcc_no_link=yes.
>> Find out why it's setting that.
>
> It always does for newlib. The libtool tests are relatively recent
> (from some recent autotools upgrade).
>
Yes, It was added by
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2007-05/msg00247.html
Jie
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-09-18 14:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 72+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-09-18 11:56 Jie Zhang
2007-09-18 12:25 ` Bernd Schmidt
2007-09-18 12:52 ` Jie Zhang
2007-09-18 13:13 ` Bernd Schmidt
2007-09-18 13:15 ` Jie Zhang
2007-09-18 13:27 ` Bernd Schmidt
2007-09-18 13:33 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-09-18 14:11 ` Jie Zhang [this message]
2007-09-18 14:02 ` Jie Zhang
2007-09-18 14:27 ` Bernd Schmidt
2007-09-18 14:48 ` Jie Zhang
2007-11-27 14:10 ` Bernd Schmidt
2007-11-27 22:40 ` Mark Mitchell
2007-11-27 22:46 ` Bernd Schmidt
2007-11-27 23:40 ` Mark Mitchell
2007-11-27 23:48 ` Bernd Schmidt
2007-11-28 0:19 ` Mark Mitchell
2007-11-28 0:43 ` Bernd Schmidt
2007-11-28 0:45 ` Mark Mitchell
2007-11-28 0:55 ` Bernd Schmidt
2007-11-28 1:05 ` Mark Mitchell
2007-11-28 1:14 ` Bernd Schmidt
2007-11-28 2:14 ` Mark Mitchell
2007-11-28 13:30 ` Bernd Schmidt
2007-11-28 1:28 ` Joseph S. Myers
2007-11-28 2:07 ` Mark Mitchell
2007-11-28 2:40 ` Joseph S. Myers
2007-11-28 8:12 ` Mark Mitchell
2007-11-28 13:17 ` Bernd Schmidt
2007-11-28 11:40 ` Hans-Peter Nilsson
2007-11-28 13:06 ` Richard Sandiford
2007-11-28 14:32 ` Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
2007-11-28 17:33 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-11-28 19:49 ` Mark Mitchell
2007-11-28 21:04 ` Richard Sandiford
2007-11-28 22:42 ` Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
2007-11-29 6:15 ` Mark Mitchell
2007-11-30 19:37 ` Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
2007-11-30 19:45 ` Mark Mitchell
2007-11-30 22:19 ` Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
2007-12-01 9:48 ` Richard Sandiford
2007-12-01 11:53 ` Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
2007-12-01 12:03 ` Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
2007-12-01 13:37 ` Andreas Schwab
2007-12-01 22:35 ` Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
2007-12-02 21:11 ` Mark Mitchell
2007-12-04 14:46 ` Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
2007-11-29 22:59 ` Richard Sandiford
2007-11-29 23:18 ` Mark Mitchell
2007-11-29 23:33 ` Benjamin Kosnik
2007-11-30 16:11 ` Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
2007-11-30 16:27 ` Mark Mitchell
2007-11-30 22:18 ` Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
2007-11-30 17:00 ` Richard Sandiford
2007-11-30 18:17 ` Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
2007-11-30 20:52 ` Mark Mitchell
2007-11-30 21:17 ` DJ Delorie
2007-12-01 9:55 ` Richard Sandiford
2007-12-02 21:01 ` Mark Mitchell
2007-12-03 15:55 ` Richard Sandiford
2007-11-30 22:48 ` Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
[not found] ` <20071203092630.N17510@dair.pair.com>
[not found] ` <87d4tn4v94.fsf@firetop.home>
2007-12-03 18:13 ` Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
2007-11-30 18:59 ` Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
2007-11-28 1:42 ` Joseph S. Myers
2007-09-18 13:55 ` Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
2007-09-18 14:19 ` Jie Zhang
2007-09-18 16:09 ` Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
2007-09-18 17:45 ` Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
2007-09-19 3:43 ` Jie Zhang
2007-11-28 1:34 Benjamin Kosnik
2007-11-28 2:04 ` Joseph S. Myers
2007-11-28 3:11 ` Benjamin Kosnik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=46EFDC9D.8060604@gmail.com \
--to=jzhang918@gmail.com \
--cc=bernds_cb1@t-online.de \
--cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).