From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14727 invoked by alias); 3 Dec 2007 18:58:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 14718 invoked by uid 22791); 3 Dec 2007 18:58:34 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from smtp-out.google.com (HELO smtp-out.google.com) (216.239.33.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Mon, 03 Dec 2007 18:58:28 +0000 Received: from zps78.corp.google.com (zps78.corp.google.com [172.25.146.78]) by smtp-out.google.com with ESMTP id lB3IwIv0026623 for ; Mon, 3 Dec 2007 18:58:19 GMT Received: from rv-out-0910.google.com (rvfc27.prod.google.com [10.140.180.27]) by zps78.corp.google.com with ESMTP id lB3IvR6x005217 for ; Mon, 3 Dec 2007 10:58:18 -0800 Received: by rv-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id c27so2741917rvf for ; Mon, 03 Dec 2007 10:58:17 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.141.171.6 with SMTP id y6mr363426rvo.1196708297437; Mon, 03 Dec 2007 10:58:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from legolas.novillo.homelinux.org ( [99.229.48.247]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id q18sm7352692qbq.2007.12.03.10.58.14 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 03 Dec 2007 10:58:16 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <475451C5.1080204@google.com> Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2007 18:58:00 -0000 From: Diego Novillo User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071115) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Richard Kenner CC: bernds_cb1@t-online.de, dannyb@google.com, gcc@gcc.gnu.org, sam@rfc1149.net Subject: Re: Rant about ChangeLog entries and commit messages References: <2007-12-02-11-05-39+trackit+sam@rfc1149.net> <47543DE8.3010003@google.com> <475440E8.4000109@t-online.de> <475448BC.2020103@google.com> <10712031850.AA00730@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu> In-Reply-To: <10712031850.AA00730@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2007-12/txt/msg00090.txt.bz2 On 12/03/07 13:50, Richard Kenner wrote: >> I guess that could work, but that wouldn't give a way into the history >> for the change. Several times there is a post-mortem discussion on the >> patch, leading to more patches. > > How about both? Sure. Diego.