From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13272 invoked by alias); 13 Dec 2007 14:09:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 13263 invoked by uid 22791); 13 Dec 2007 14:09:51 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from smtp-out.google.com (HELO smtp-out.google.com) (216.239.33.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 13 Dec 2007 14:09:40 +0000 Received: from zps78.corp.google.com (zps78.corp.google.com [172.25.146.78]) by smtp-out.google.com with ESMTP id lBDE9VcH014607 for ; Thu, 13 Dec 2007 14:09:32 GMT Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com (wahj5.prod.google.com [10.114.236.5]) by zps78.corp.google.com with ESMTP id lBDE80Gt006582 for ; Thu, 13 Dec 2007 06:09:31 -0800 Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id j5so1097300wah.15 for ; Thu, 13 Dec 2007 06:09:30 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.114.148.1 with SMTP id v1mr2313390wad.21.1197554970941; Thu, 13 Dec 2007 06:09:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from dhcp-172-29-27-188.tor.corp.google.com ( [66.46.136.44]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id j31sm10338202waf.2007.12.13.06.09.28 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 13 Dec 2007 06:09:29 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4761334A.2070709@google.com> Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 14:09:00 -0000 From: Diego Novillo User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Macintosh/20071031) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ollie Wild CC: tejgcc@westnet.com.au, gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: [RFC] WHOPR - A whole program optimizer framework for GCC References: <47603F3C.2090808@google.com> <1197502096.6006.14.camel@tim-gcc> <65dd6fd50712122339h2c856fdbpe127417e6726bd6@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <65dd6fd50712122339h2c856fdbpe127417e6726bd6@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2007-12/txt/msg00405.txt.bz2 On 12/13/07 2:39 AM, Ollie Wild wrote: > The lto branch is already doing this, so presumably that discussion > was resolved (Maybe someone in the know should pipe up.). Yes, streaming the IL to/from disk is a resolved issue. > I believe a stable representation is an explicit non-goal of the LTO > project (Perhaps that was the "resolution" of the discussion above.). Right. The on-disk representation will tend to be unstable. Diego.