From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22355 invoked by alias); 15 Dec 2007 20:32:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 22341 invoked by uid 22791); 15 Dec 2007 20:32:31 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Sat, 15 Dec 2007 20:32:21 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 154412A96A6; Sat, 15 Dec 2007 15:32:20 -0500 (EST) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id kbgPvvD2CqeD; Sat, 15 Dec 2007 15:32:20 -0500 (EST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (nile.gnat.com [205.232.38.5]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5BE92A969F; Sat, 15 Dec 2007 15:32:19 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <476439CE.6050907@adacore.com> Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2007 21:41:00 -0000 From: Robert Dewar User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alexandre Oliva CC: Richard Kenner , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, gcc@gcc.gnu.org, iant@google.com, mark@codesourcery.com, richard.guenther@gmail.com, stevenb.gcc@gmail.com Subject: Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC References: <571f6b510711121208m2bf7c77fp884f52d458df118b@mail.gmail.com> <571f6b510711231556o439e7bbek9ab4855079bab51d@mail.gmail.com> <10711240545.AA22279@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu> <4748B43B.8040609@adacore.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2007-12/txt/msg00450.txt.bz2 Alexandre Oliva wrote: > On Nov 24, 2007, Robert Dewar wrote: > >> Alexandre Oliva wrote: > >>> Besides, the Ada RTS compiles differently with -g than without -g, >>> such that compare-debug doesn't pass if you compare sysdep.o. Nobody >>> but me seems to care. > >> We certainly care about this, and appreciate efforts to fix it! > > Should be fixed now, FWIW. Good to hear, definition worth while! that's an important invariant. >