public inbox for gcc@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com>
To: Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp@bitrange.com>
Cc: trevor_smigiel@playstation.sony.com, gcc <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>,
	  Russell_Olsen@playstation.sony.com
Subject: Re: __builtin_expect for indirect function calls
Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2007 19:10:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4772A350.6030907@codesourcery.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071221220630.Y67443@dair.pair.com>

Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Dec 2007, trevor_smigiel@playstation.sony.com wrote:
>> When we can't hint the real target, we want to hint the most common
>> target.   There are potentially clever ways for the compiler to do this
>> automatically, but I'm most interested in giving the user some way to do
>> it explicitly.  One possiblity is to have something similar to
>> __builtin_expect, but for functions.  For example, I propose:
>>
>>   __builtin_expect_call (FP, PFP)
> 
> Is there a hidden benefit?  I mean, isn't this really
> expressable using builtin_expect as-is, at least when it comes
> to the syntax?  

That was my first thought as well.  Before we add __builtin_expect_call,
I think there needs to be a justification of why this can't be done with
__builtin_expect as-is.

-- 
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery
mark@codesourcery.com
(650) 331-3385 x713

  reply	other threads:[~2007-12-26 18:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-12-18  0:52 trevor_smigiel
2007-12-18  2:27 ` Jonathan Adamczewski
2007-12-22  3:42 ` Hans-Peter Nilsson
2007-12-26 19:10   ` Mark Mitchell [this message]
2008-01-03 23:36     ` trevor_smigiel
2008-01-05  5:44       ` Mark Mitchell
2008-01-05 10:40         ` Richard Guenther
2008-01-06 19:44           ` Mark Mitchell
2008-01-07 21:15             ` Mark Mendell
2008-01-08 15:36               ` Dave Korn
2008-01-08 15:51                 ` Dave Korn
2008-01-03 23:46   ` trevor_smigiel
2008-01-06 20:42 Ross Ridge

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4772A350.6030907@codesourcery.com \
    --to=mark@codesourcery.com \
    --cc=Russell_Olsen@playstation.sony.com \
    --cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=hp@bitrange.com \
    --cc=trevor_smigiel@playstation.sony.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).