public inbox for gcc@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sergei Poselenov <sposelenov@emcraft.com>
To: Andrew Haley <aph@redhat.com>
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: powercp-linux cross GCC 4.2 vs GCC 4.0.0: -Os code size regression?
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 17:14:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <478E3A4F.7070700@emcraft.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <18318.13924.827172.239806@zebedee.pink>

Hello Andrew,

> Now, I sympathize that in your particular case you have a code size
> regression.  This happens: when we do optimization in gcc, some code
> bases will lose out.  All that we can promise is that we try not to
> make it worse for most users.
> 
> What we can do is compare your code that has got much worse, and try
> to figure out why.
> 

Would the generated asm listings be enough? Or should I send
the preprocessed sources as well?

Thanks a lot!

Regards,
Sergei

> Andrew.
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2008-01-16 17:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-01-16 11:24 Sergei Poselenov
2008-01-16 12:15 ` Duncan Sands
2008-01-16 12:19   ` Sergei Poselenov
2008-01-16 12:35     ` Duncan Sands
2008-01-16 13:20     ` Andrew Haley
2008-01-16 13:17 ` Andrew Haley
2008-01-16 15:59   ` Sergei Poselenov
2008-01-16 17:10     ` Andrew Haley
2008-01-16 17:14       ` Sergei Poselenov [this message]
2008-01-16 19:36         ` Andrew Haley
2008-01-17 14:52           ` powercp-linux cross GCC 4.2 vs GCC 4.0.0: -Os code size regression? [Emcraft #11717] Sergei Poselenov
2008-01-17 15:11             ` Richard Guenther
2008-01-17 18:27             ` Gabriel Paubert
2008-01-19 16:26               ` Andrew Haley
2008-01-19 16:35                 ` David Edelsohn
2008-01-19 16:51                   ` Andrew Haley
2008-01-19 19:10                     ` David Edelsohn
2008-01-21 17:25                     ` powercp-linux cross GCC 4.2 vs GCC 4.0.0: -Os code size regression? (filed bug 34903)[Emcraft #11717] Sergei Poselenov
2008-01-17 12:14     ` powercp-linux cross GCC 4.2 vs GCC 4.0.0: -Os code size regression? Gabriel Paubert
2008-01-17 12:47       ` Sergei Poselenov
2008-01-17 13:10         ` Gabriel Paubert

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=478E3A4F.7070700@emcraft.com \
    --to=sposelenov@emcraft.com \
    --cc=aph@redhat.com \
    --cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).