From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-147108-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 24729 invoked by alias); 6 Jun 2008 15:40:43 -0000
Received: (qmail 24721 invoked by uid 22791); 6 Jun 2008 15:40:43 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (HELO wx-out-0506.google.com) (66.249.82.230)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 Jun 2008 15:40:22 +0000
Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id h30so842746wxd.14         for <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>; Fri, 06 Jun 2008 08:40:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.90.33.20 with SMTP id g20mr179259agg.104.1212766820234;         Fri, 06 Jun 2008 08:40:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?192.168.1.10? ( [70.104.131.225])         by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id s40sm98052hsb.8.2008.06.06.08.40.19         (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5);         Fri, 06 Jun 2008 08:40:19 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <48495A62.9000005@naturalbridge.com>
Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2008 15:40:00 -0000
From: Kenneth Zadeck <zadeck@naturalbridge.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (X11/20080226)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Arnaud Charlet <charlet@adacore.com>
CC: gcc <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>, Diego Novillo <dnovillo@google.com>,   Ollie Wild <aaw@google.com>,  "Maddox, Bill" <maddox@google.com>,   Rafael Espindola <espindola@google.com>,  "Hubicha, Jan" <jh@suse.cz>
Subject: Re: ln -r and cherry picking.
References: <484957E1.9010103@naturalbridge.com> <20080606153348.GA87427@adacore.com>
In-Reply-To: <20080606153348.GA87427@adacore.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2008-06/txt/msg00154.txt.bz2

Arnaud Charlet wrote:
>> I want to point out that the current implementation of lto is not
>> compatible with "ln -r", and will need to be modified to support
>> "cherry picking" the function bodies.
>>     
>
> I assume you mean "ld -r", right ?
>
> Arno
>   
yes, of course. Dennis Richie's curse: two letter commands.