From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5429 invoked by alias); 2 Apr 2002 22:26:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 4558 invoked from network); 2 Apr 2002 22:25:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO gandalf.codesourcery.com) (66.60.148.227) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 2 Apr 2002 22:25:25 -0000 Received: from gandalf.codesourcery.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by gandalf.codesourcery.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g32MN0D17588 for ; Tue, 2 Apr 2002 14:23:01 -0800 Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2002 14:38:00 -0000 From: Mark Mitchell To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: GCC 3.1 Release Message-ID: <48730000.1017786180@gandalf.codesourcery.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg00047.txt.bz2 Now that Richard has made GNATS immune to random new bugs being classified as "high" priority, it makes sense to go back to using high-priority bugs in GNATS -- rather than an external issuse list -- as our way to measure what needs to be done before the release. To that end, I've made sure that everything on the issues list is marked "high" in GNATS, and checked in a new copy of the issues list that indicates it is no longer in use. Now we need to weed out any not-really-high-priority bugs in GNATS, and fix what's there. Thanks, -- Mark Mitchell mark@codesourcery.com CodeSourcery, LLC http://www.codesourcery.com