* Slush, please?
@ 2009-04-28 17:51 Hans-Peter Nilsson
2009-04-28 18:02 ` Andrew Pinski
2009-04-28 18:06 ` Paolo Bonzini
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Hans-Peter Nilsson @ 2009-04-28 17:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc
I don't see a request, yet more than two people seem to agree,
so: can we have a slush (no new merges or features) while the
tree is stabilized?
I'll let other people answer the "why" wrt. priority platforms;
the double breakages for cris-elf (PR39927, PR39938) don't
count. :/
brgds, H-P
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Slush, please?
2009-04-28 17:51 Slush, please? Hans-Peter Nilsson
@ 2009-04-28 18:02 ` Andrew Pinski
2009-04-28 18:06 ` Paolo Bonzini
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Pinski @ 2009-04-28 18:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Hans-Peter Nilsson; +Cc: gcc
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 7:17 AM, Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp@bitrange.com> wrote:
> I don't see a request, yet more than two people seem to agree,
> so: can we have a slush (no new merges or features) while the
> tree is stabilized?
>
> I'll let other people answer the "why" wrt. priority platforms;
> the double breakages for cris-elf (PR39927, PR39938) don't
> count. :/
There are some testsuite failures on powerpc-darwin (there was a
bootstrap failure but I just fixed that though).
Thanks,
Andrew Pinski
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Slush, please?
2009-04-28 17:51 Slush, please? Hans-Peter Nilsson
2009-04-28 18:02 ` Andrew Pinski
@ 2009-04-28 18:06 ` Paolo Bonzini
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Paolo Bonzini @ 2009-04-28 18:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Hans-Peter Nilsson; +Cc: gcc
Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
> I don't see a request, yet more than two people seem to agree,
> so: can we have a slush (no new merges or features) while the
> tree is stabilized?
>
> I'll let other people answer the "why" wrt. priority platforms;
> the double breakages for cris-elf (PR39927, PR39938) don't
> count. :/
Even if all the primary/secondary platforms were fixed right now, I
think that it is good to slow down, since we found out the hard way that
SSA expansion has relatively deep target-dependent ramifications.
Paolo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-04-28 15:00 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-04-28 17:51 Slush, please? Hans-Peter Nilsson
2009-04-28 18:02 ` Andrew Pinski
2009-04-28 18:06 ` Paolo Bonzini
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).