From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9745 invoked by alias); 6 May 2009 15:36:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 9629 invoked by uid 22791); 6 May 2009 15:36:33 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from ey-out-1920.google.com (HELO ey-out-1920.google.com) (74.125.78.147) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 May 2009 15:36:28 +0000 Received: by ey-out-1920.google.com with SMTP id 3so59367eyh.14 for ; Wed, 06 May 2009 08:36:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.210.51.18 with SMTP id y18mr6225465eby.22.1241624185616; Wed, 06 May 2009 08:36:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scientist-2.mobile.usilu.net ([195.176.179.202]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 5sm1856746eyh.30.2009.05.06.08.36.24 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 06 May 2009 08:36:25 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4A01AE78.1040604@gnu.org> Date: Wed, 06 May 2009 15:36:00 -0000 From: Paolo Bonzini User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Macintosh/20090302) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dave Korn CC: "gcc@gcc.gnu.org" Subject: Re: What precisely is the status of ppl/cloog anyway? References: <4A01ABEF.9060708@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4A01ABEF.9060708@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2009-05/txt/msg00124.txt.bz2 Dave Korn wrote: > Sorry to have to ask a dumb question, but it's not clear to me and I'm not > having a lot of luck searching recent list posts: > > Are cloog and ppl now mandatory requirements for building gcc, or are they > still optional extras? Optional. Paolo