From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16901 invoked by alias); 6 May 2009 22:06:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 16832 invoked by uid 22791); 6 May 2009 22:06:35 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com (HELO fg-out-1718.google.com) (72.14.220.159) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 May 2009 22:06:25 +0000 Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 13so157503fge.5 for ; Wed, 06 May 2009 15:06:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.86.59.18 with SMTP id h18mr1779838fga.44.1241647582253; Wed, 06 May 2009 15:06:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?82.6.108.62? (cpc2-cmbg8-0-0-cust61.cmbg.cable.ntl.com [82.6.108.62]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id l19sm11433461fgb.12.2009.05.06.15.06.20 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 06 May 2009 15:06:21 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4A020C81.1010802@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 06 May 2009 22:25:00 -0000 From: Dave Korn User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ian Lance Taylor CC: Andrew Haley , =?UTF-8?B?TWFudWVsIEzDs3Blei1JYsOhw7Fl?= =?UTF-8?B?eg==?= , Paolo Bonzini , gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: archives broken? References: <6c33472e0905061027m15a2d95dof13ed9f4587b8e4c@mail.gmail.com> <4A01CA01.3080701@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2009-05/txt/msg00177.txt.bz2 Ian Lance Taylor wrote: > Andrew Haley writes: > >> Manuel López-Ibáñez wrote: >>> 2009/5/6 Paolo Bonzini : >>>> It looks like a bunch of missing from >>>> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-02/ are missing. Anybody knows >>>> what could be the cause? >>> Relevant PRs 20336, 20588, 3119. >> I'm pretty sure I have a complete set of the messages. > > I believe that we have a complete set of messages too. Fixing the web > pages takes somebody with the time and energy to figure out what is > required. The mailing list archives are built using mhonarc. Any > volunteers? I could have a rummage. I have a little experience with mhonarc, having installed and maintained some in-house mailing list archives in my last job. I never had to rebuild an index, but I recall reading that it's fairly straightforward to feed it emails in mbox format and get it to rebuild the indices (which hopefully should all line-up as they were before rather than result in any message numbers shifting about). cheers, DaveK