From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-153937-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 18097 invoked by alias); 12 May 2009 13:56:52 -0000
Received: (qmail 18088 invoked by uid 22791); 12 May 2009 13:56:51 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mx2.redhat.com (HELO mx2.redhat.com) (66.187.237.31)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 12 May 2009 13:56:42 +0000
Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (int-mx2.corp.redhat.com [172.16.27.26]) 	by mx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n4CDueka021343 	for <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>; Tue, 12 May 2009 09:56:40 -0400
Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) 	by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n4CDudbi004865 	for <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>; Tue, 12 May 2009 09:56:40 -0400
Received: from toll.yyz.redhat.com (toll.yyz.redhat.com [10.15.16.165]) 	by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n4CDudgB030418 	for <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>; Tue, 12 May 2009 09:56:39 -0400
Message-ID: <4A098018.1030900@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 16:27:00 -0000
From: Vladimir Makarov <vmakarov@redhat.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090105)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "gcc.gcc.gnu.org" <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: New GCC releases comparison and comparison of GCC4.4 and LLVM2.5  on SPEC2000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2009-05/txt/msg00304.txt.bz2

A few people asked me to do a new comparison of GCC releases and LLVM as 
the new GCC release and LLVM were out recently.

You can find the comparison on http://vmakarov.fedorapeople.org/spec/

The comparison for x86 (32-bit mode) was done on Pentium4 and  for 
x86_64 (64-bit mode) on Core I7.

Some changes in the performance were big since GCC 3.2 and it is 
sometimes hard to see small changes on the posted graphs.   Therefore I 
put original tables used to generate the graphs.