From: Vladimir Makarov <vmakarov@redhat.com>
To: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph@codesourcery.com>
Cc: Chris Lattner <clattner@apple.com>,
"gcc.gcc.gnu.org" <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>,
Evan Cheng <evan.cheng@apple.com>
Subject: Re: New GCC releases comparison and comparison of GCC4.4 and LLVM2.5 on SPEC2000
Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 18:42:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A09BDC3.9070404@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0905121803130.11489@digraph.polyomino.org.uk>
Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> On Tue, 12 May 2009, Chris Lattner wrote:
>
>
>> 1. I have a hard time understanding the code size numbers. Does 10% mean that
>> GCC is generating 10% bigger or 10% smaller code than llvm?
>>
>
> I have a different comment on the code size numbers: could we have
> comparisons of code size for -Os rather than (or in addition to) -O2 and
> -O3? If someone is particularly concerned with code size, -Os is what
> they are expected to use.
>
>
Thanks for pointing this, Joseph.
Yes, it would be interesting to see how GCC code size is changed with
-Os (as the performance too). But probably it is even more interesting
for embedded processors. When I am less busy, I'll try to do it.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-05-12 18:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-05-12 16:27 Vladimir Makarov
2009-05-12 18:05 ` Chris Lattner
2009-05-12 18:21 ` Vladimir Makarov
2009-05-12 19:25 ` Chris Lattner
2009-05-12 22:48 ` Rafael Espindola
2009-05-12 19:41 ` Vladimir Makarov
2009-05-13 12:11 ` Duncan Sands
2009-05-13 12:38 ` Richard Guenther
2009-05-13 12:55 ` Joseph S. Myers
2009-05-13 13:51 ` Duncan Sands
2009-05-26 12:27 ` Chris Lattner
2009-05-26 13:48 ` Vincent Lefevre
2009-05-28 23:00 ` Joseph S. Myers
2009-05-13 20:06 ` Evan Cheng
2009-05-12 18:29 ` Joseph S. Myers
2009-05-12 18:42 ` Vladimir Makarov [this message]
2009-05-13 8:44 ` Andi Kleen
2009-05-13 9:56 ` Jakub Jelinek
2009-05-13 11:32 ` Paolo Bonzini
2009-05-13 11:35 ` Paolo Bonzini
2009-05-13 12:07 ` Andi Kleen
2009-05-13 12:23 ` Steven Bosscher
2009-05-13 12:27 ` Dave Korn
2009-05-13 15:14 ` Paolo Bonzini
2009-05-13 16:16 ` Vladimir Makarov
2009-05-13 17:59 ` Jan Hubicka
2009-05-13 18:11 ` Michael Meissner
2009-05-15 20:19 ` Toon Moene
2009-05-13 6:42 ` Steven Bosscher
2009-05-13 7:33 ` Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A09BDC3.9070404@redhat.com \
--to=vmakarov@redhat.com \
--cc=clattner@apple.com \
--cc=evan.cheng@apple.com \
--cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=joseph@codesourcery.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).