From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-154853-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 21383 invoked by alias); 22 Jun 2009 13:38:06 -0000
Received: (qmail 21368 invoked by uid 22791); 22 Jun 2009 13:38:02 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_SOFTFAIL
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mx2.redhat.com (HELO mx2.redhat.com) (66.187.237.31)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 22 Jun 2009 13:37:54 +0000
Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (int-mx2.corp.redhat.com [172.16.27.26]) 	by mx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n5MDbmEu026486; 	Mon, 22 Jun 2009 09:37:48 -0400
Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) 	by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n5MDblA5004666; 	Mon, 22 Jun 2009 09:37:47 -0400
Received: from yakj.usersys.redhat.com (dhcp-lab-149.englab.brq.redhat.com [10.34.33.149]) 	by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n5MDbjqG003126; 	Mon, 22 Jun 2009 09:37:45 -0400
Message-ID: <4A3F8921.3020801@gnu.org>
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 13:38:00 -0000
From: Paolo Bonzini <bonzini@gnu.org>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (X11/20081009)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Dave Korn <dave.korn.cygwin@googlemail.com>
CC: Richard Guenther <richard.guenther@gmail.com>,         Daniel Berlin <dberlin@dberlin.org>, Jeff Law <law@redhat.com>,         GCC <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: (known?) Issue with bitmap iterators
References: <4A3CF81C.7050406@redhat.com>	 <4aca3dc20906211944hb27a3day21bc22c8a9f58aee@mail.gmail.com>	 <4A3F6ED1.6020106@gmail.com> <84fc9c000906220437t2d6fcb8fx6a59a45b7ed49abd@mail.gmail.com> <4A3F84C7.2000004@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4A3F84C7.2000004@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2009-06/txt/msg00507.txt.bz2


>   I took a look.  I don't think it would be hideously hacky to do something
> like ...
> 
> #define EXECUTE_IF_SET_IN_BITMAP(BITMAP, MIN, BITNUM, ITER)		\
>   for ((BITMAP)->ro_flag = true,					\
> 	bmp_iter_set_init (&(ITER), (BITMAP), (MIN), &(BITNUM));	\
>        (BITMAP)->ro_flag = bmp_iter_set (&(ITER), &(BITNUM));		\
>        bmp_iter_next (&(ITER), &(BITNUM)))

You should add a BREAK_FROM_EXECUTE_IF_SET(BITMAP) macro too, however.

Paolo