From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-154863-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 31356 invoked by alias); 22 Jun 2009 19:03:33 -0000
Received: (qmail 31141 invoked by uid 22791); 22 Jun 2009 19:03:32 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mail-ew0-f225.google.com (HELO mail-ew0-f225.google.com) (209.85.219.225)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 22 Jun 2009 19:03:27 +0000
Received: by ewy25 with SMTP id 25so699179ewy.8         for <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>; Mon, 22 Jun 2009 12:03:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.210.43.11 with SMTP id q11mr5277836ebq.73.1245697404640;         Mon, 22 Jun 2009 12:03:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?192.168.2.99? (cpc2-cmbg8-0-0-cust61.cmbg.cable.ntl.com [82.6.108.62])         by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 5sm148449eyh.20.2009.06.22.12.03.23         (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5);         Mon, 22 Jun 2009 12:03:24 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4A3FD0AE.10508@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 19:03:00 -0000
From: Dave Korn <dave.korn.cygwin@googlemail.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Paolo Bonzini <bonzini@gnu.org>
CC: Dave Korn <dave.korn.cygwin@googlemail.com>,   Richard Guenther <richard.guenther@gmail.com>,  Daniel Berlin <dberlin@dberlin.org>, Jeff Law <law@redhat.com>,   GCC <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: (known?) Issue with bitmap iterators
References: <4A3CF81C.7050406@redhat.com>	 <4aca3dc20906211944hb27a3day21bc22c8a9f58aee@mail.gmail.com>	 <4A3F6ED1.6020106@gmail.com> <84fc9c000906220437t2d6fcb8fx6a59a45b7ed49abd@mail.gmail.com> <4A3F84C7.2000004@gmail.com> <4A3F8921.3020801@gnu.org>
In-Reply-To: <4A3F8921.3020801@gnu.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2009-06/txt/msg00517.txt.bz2

Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> 
>>   I took a look.  I don't think it would be hideously hacky to do
>> something like ...
>>
>> #define EXECUTE_IF_SET_IN_BITMAP(BITMAP, MIN, BITNUM, ITER)        \
>>   for ((BITMAP)->ro_flag = true,                    \
>>     bmp_iter_set_init (&(ITER), (BITMAP), (MIN), &(BITNUM));    \
>>        (BITMAP)->ro_flag = bmp_iter_set (&(ITER), &(BITNUM));        \
>>        bmp_iter_next (&(ITER), &(BITNUM)))
> 
> You should add a BREAK_FROM_EXECUTE_IF_SET(BITMAP) macro too, however.
> 
> Paolo

  :) I should, but I'm way too loaded at the moment to actually generate this
patch... already got two simultaneous testruns going that will tie up my PC
for a couple of days.  Sorry.

    cheers,
      DaveK