From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-155090-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 4465 invoked by alias); 1 Jul 2009 21:34:00 -0000
Received: (qmail 4456 invoked by uid 22791); 1 Jul 2009 21:33:59 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mx2.redhat.com (HELO mx2.redhat.com) (66.187.237.31)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 21:33:53 +0000
Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (int-mx2.corp.redhat.com [172.16.27.26]) 	by mx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n61LXqho007028; 	Wed, 1 Jul 2009 17:33:52 -0400
Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) 	by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n61LXp4U002798; 	Wed, 1 Jul 2009 17:33:51 -0400
Received: from stone.twiddle.home (vpn-11-50.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.11.50]) 	by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n61LXowk019497; 	Wed, 1 Jul 2009 17:33:50 -0400
Message-ID: <4A4BD63D.1050009@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2009 21:34:00 -0000
From: Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1b3pre) Gecko/20090513 Fedora/3.0-2.3.beta2.fc11 Thunderbird/3.0b2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Jean Christophe Beyler <jean.christophe.beyler@gmail.com>
CC: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: Immediates propagated wrongly in stores
References: <c568a2600907010836u7e09bedbta8fab25573d9e988@mail.gmail.com>	 <4A4B8D6A.5060404@redhat.com>	 <c568a2600907011128n50629013g3bfecc31197228b3@mail.gmail.com>	 <4A4BB87D.8090608@redhat.com> <c568a2600907011402n22f25fb4r6ca7cab1118cd1af@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <c568a2600907011402n22f25fb4r6ca7cab1118cd1af@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2009-07/txt/msg00030.txt.bz2

On 07/01/2009 02:02 PM, Jean Christophe Beyler wrote:
>              ((reload_in_progress | reload_completed) == 0&&
>              MEM_P (op0)&&  !REG_P (op1)))
>      {
>          op1 = force_reg (GET_MODE (op0), op1);
>          emit_move_insn (op0, op1);
>          return 1;

I wouldn't think you'd actually need these reload checks.
At least some other ports I glanced at don't need them.


r~