From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7925 invoked by alias); 27 Jul 2009 10:10:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 7916 invoked by uid 22791); 27 Jul 2009 10:10:37 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-ew0-f210.google.com (HELO mail-ew0-f210.google.com) (209.85.219.210) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 10:10:30 +0000 Received: by ewy6 with SMTP id 6so3040284ewy.8 for ; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 03:10:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.210.126.5 with SMTP id y5mr4777850ebc.22.1248689418679; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 03:10:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from yakj.usersys.redhat.com (nat-pool-brq.redhat.com [62.40.79.66]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 7sm3633497eyb.56.2009.07.27.03.10.17 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 27 Jul 2009 03:10:17 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4A6D7D05.2060503@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 10:10:00 -0000 From: Paolo Bonzini User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1b3pre) Gecko/20090513 Fedora/3.0-2.3.beta2.fc11 Lightning/1.0pre Thunderbird/3.0b2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Robert Dewar CC: Florian Weimer , Paolo Bonzini , Joe Buck , "gcc@gcc.gnu.org" Subject: Re: Compiling programs licensed under the GPL version 2 with GCC 4.4 References: <87y6qcfprf.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> <20090726015725.GA29580@synopsys.com> <87y6qc0wmc.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> <20090726215044.GA21312@synopsys.com> <87ocr6ejwr.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> <4A6D5274.6060605@gnu.org> <87prbmcvtx.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> <4A6D7C4C.4040404@adacore.com> In-Reply-To: <4A6D7C4C.4040404@adacore.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2009-07/txt/msg00549.txt.bz2 > b) you should ignore all such discussions, since they invariablly > include lots of legal-sounding opinions from people who are not > lawyers and don't know, and often have significant misconceptions. Indeed I'm not answering to Florian's latest message, because I'm not sure what he misunderstood of my message and I would probably give out wrong information. But I don't see much misinformation in the replies so far (can't judge mine of course), unlike other recent licensing threads. Paolo