From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11401 invoked by alias); 31 Jul 2009 21:40:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 11387 invoked by uid 22791); 31 Jul 2009 21:40:21 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx2.redhat.com (HELO mx2.redhat.com) (66.187.237.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 31 Jul 2009 21:40:14 +0000 Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (int-mx2.corp.redhat.com [172.16.27.26]) by mx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n6VLdBZ9007938; Fri, 31 Jul 2009 17:39:21 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n6VLctvD018092; Fri, 31 Jul 2009 17:39:00 -0400 Received: from [IPv6:::1] (sebastian-int.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.221]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n6VLcpQU014881; Fri, 31 Jul 2009 17:38:53 -0400 Message-ID: <4A73646B.4010808@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 21:40:00 -0000 From: Jason Merrill User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.3pre) Gecko/20090730 Shredder/3.0b4pre MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ed Smith-Rowland <3dw4rd@verizon.net> CC: James Dennett , Piotr Wyderski , "gcc@gcc.gnu.org >> GCC" Subject: Re: The future of concepts References: <9f8a01cd0907280301i2688abefh3874945bf3c180ac@mail.gmail.com> <18738acb0907280305n7ff7fc19x6f3867a87ff5bf86@mail.gmail.com> <4A6F0F84.8060504@verizon.net> In-Reply-To: <4A6F0F84.8060504@verizon.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2009-07/txt/msg00641.txt.bz2 On 07/28/2009 10:47 AM, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote: > We need a gcc branch for concepts. Probably, if someone is working on them, just as for any ongoing project. > That leaves open the question of whether the ConceptGCC branch is the > one. No. Doug felt that much of ConceptGCC needed to be rewritten; the ConceptGCC branch is just a place to store the existing work for later reference. There is a cxx0x-concepts-branch, but no work has been done on it. Probably when someone starts serious work on reimplementing concepts we'll create a new branch. I don't currently have any plans to work on concepts, as there are plenty of other things to work on that will be in C++0x. Jason