From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19383 invoked by alias); 19 Aug 2009 11:55:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 19375 invoked by uid 22791); 19 Aug 2009 11:55:37 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-ew0-f226.google.com (HELO mail-ew0-f226.google.com) (209.85.219.226) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 19 Aug 2009 11:55:30 +0000 Received: by ewy26 with SMTP id 26so4269476ewy.29 for ; Wed, 19 Aug 2009 04:55:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.210.16.11 with SMTP id 11mr5641219ebp.50.1250682927461; Wed, 19 Aug 2009 04:55:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from yakj.usersys.redhat.com (nat-pool-brq.redhat.com [62.40.79.66]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 5sm3330177eyf.58.2009.08.19.04.55.25 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 19 Aug 2009 04:55:25 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4A8BE82B.3000803@gnu.org> Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 12:27:00 -0000 From: Paolo Bonzini User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.1) Gecko/20090814 Fedora/3.0-2.6.b3.fc11 Lightning/1.0pre Thunderbird/3.0b3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Paul Edwards CC: Ulrich Weigand , gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: i370 port References: <200908121348.n7CDmrV1012019@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2009-08/txt/msg00332.txt.bz2 > My experience is that fold-const.c requires 20 MB of memory (not > including the size of the executable) to compile with -Os. That's > the biggest. > > Is that typical/expected? It doesn't seem too big. > Because it just occurred to me that maybe the lack of a "normal" > implementation of alloca() is causing memory to not be released, > and it's taking more space than it needs to. It may use a little more memory, but not much. Paolo