From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22995 invoked by alias); 8 Sep 2009 15:09:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 22793 invoked by uid 22791); 8 Sep 2009 15:09:19 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-bw0-f225.google.com (HELO mail-bw0-f225.google.com) (209.85.218.225) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Sep 2009 15:09:10 +0000 Received: by bwz25 with SMTP id 25so2620504bwz.8 for ; Tue, 08 Sep 2009 08:09:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.103.50.36 with SMTP id c36mr6684959muk.135.1252422547072; Tue, 08 Sep 2009 08:09:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.2.99? (cpc2-cmbg8-0-0-cust61.cmbg.cable.ntl.com [82.6.108.62]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 7sm178230mup.2.2009.09.08.08.09.05 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 08 Sep 2009 08:09:06 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4AA676D9.2030403@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2009 15:09:00 -0000 From: Dave Korn User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Eric Botcazou CC: Dave Korn , gcc@gcc.gnu.org, Laurent GUERBY Subject: Re: GNAT mysterious "missing stub for subunit" error. References: <4AA5F7F4.1070201@gmail.com> <200909081323.20594.ebotcazou@adacore.com> <4AA64852.9070504@gmail.com> <200909081528.09776.ebotcazou@adacore.com> In-Reply-To: <200909081528.09776.ebotcazou@adacore.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2009-09/txt/msg00165.txt.bz2 Eric Botcazou wrote: >> That's what I am doing, kind of, just the other way round. In 4.3.2 I >> compiled the existing port and switched it over to ZCX, and it worked well >> enough to pass most of the testsuite, including EH. Now I'm changing the >> target pairs on top of that and suddenly it's complaining, which is why I'm >> confused; I thought that bit was stable. > > Your .diff contains this > > + EH_MECHANISM=-gcc > > so it looks as though the base compiler was SJLJ. > Ah, bingo! Thanks Eric; yes, I have a recent build of an SJLJ Gnat from HEAD lying around my PATH ahead of my old 4.3.2-with-ZCX. Getting that out of the way should help! cheers, DaveK