From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1854 invoked by alias); 13 Sep 2009 17:46:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 1842 invoked by uid 22791); 13 Sep 2009 17:46:43 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sun, 13 Sep 2009 17:46:38 +0000 Received: from int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.18]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n8DHkbIl018177; Sun, 13 Sep 2009 13:46:37 -0400 Received: from yakj.usersys.redhat.com (vpn-10-27.str.redhat.com [10.32.10.27]) by int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n8DHkY41014802; Sun, 13 Sep 2009 13:46:35 -0400 Message-ID: <4AAD2FFA.4080306@redhat.com> Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 17:46:00 -0000 From: Paolo Bonzini User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.1) Gecko/20090814 Fedora/3.0-2.6.b3.fc11 Lightning/1.0pre Thunderbird/3.0b3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Gerald Pfeifer CC: Li Feng , gcc@gcc.gnu.org, dalecki@gcc.gnu.org, gp@qnx.com Subject: Re: Add my name to Write-after-Approval List References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2009-09/txt/msg00232.txt.bz2 > Hopefully the combined wisdom on this list can help getting this > addressed (one way or the other). :-) I can see five cases: 1) Some of these have requested gcc.gnu.org access only to be "bugmasters", for example they have no commits. > dalecki (Marcin Dalecki ) 2006-12-29 13 > yechiel (Yechiel Kimchi ) > martin (Martin Schindewolf ) > setton (Nicolas Setton ) > liao (Shih-wei Liao ) (Marcin does not have copyright on file, and contribute with his personal email). They should add themselves at the end of MAINTAINERS, and Marcin should be sent the copyright form ASAP unless he was covered by his employer in 2005-2006. 2) some of these do not have anymore a copyright assignment since they were covered by their employer. > zlaski (Ziemowit Laski ) 2005-09-29 429 Based on LinkedIn info, Zem's current employer does not have a GCC copyright assignment. > rodimina (Olga Rodimina ) 2005-01-06 59 > aluchko (Aaron Luchko ) 2005-07-14 9 > kgallowa (Kyle Galloway ) 2007-05-17 38 These were at Red Hat, contributed only to libjava, and AFAIK neither of the two things is true anymore. 3) some of these are covered by their employer. even if they are only contributing to a "vendor" branch, they should anyway add themselves as WAA on trunk. > tglek (Taras Glek ) 2009-05-27 6 > victorlei (Victor Leikehman ) 2004-11-18 1 Taras is still active, Victor is still at IBM according to LinkedIn. 4) some might fall under 2 or 3. Actually just one; he used to be at QNX, couldn't find any data after 2005 on qnx.com but I'm CCing him: > gp (Graeme Peterson ) 2003-08-06 3 5) some of these just forgot. Individual copyrights: > rkidd (Robert Kidd ) 2007-09-10 11 > sgilbertson (Scott Gilbertson ) 2006-02-23 13 > marekm (Marek Michalkiewicz ) 2005-03-20 57 > jfreeman (John Freeman ) 2009-08-29 118 Employer: > olga (Olga Golovanevsky ) 2008-03-19 37 > olegr (Oleg Ryjkov ) 2008-04-25 28 > jingyu (Jing Yu ) 2009-04-28 4 That's it. Paolo