From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8480 invoked by alias); 26 Sep 2009 04:54:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 8469 invoked by uid 22791); 26 Sep 2009 04:54:07 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-ew0-f226.google.com (HELO mail-ew0-f226.google.com) (209.85.219.226) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sat, 26 Sep 2009 04:54:01 +0000 Received: by ewy26 with SMTP id 26so2993794ewy.29 for ; Fri, 25 Sep 2009 21:53:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.211.147.5 with SMTP id z5mr1081066ebn.87.1253940839513; Fri, 25 Sep 2009 21:53:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.2.99? (cpc2-cmbg8-0-0-cust61.cmbg.cable.ntl.com [82.6.108.62]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 24sm1253342eyx.19.2009.09.25.21.53.58 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 25 Sep 2009 21:53:58 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4ABDA1C9.2030006@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 20:24:00 -0000 From: Dave Korn User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Laurent GUERBY CC: Dave Korn , "gcc@gcc.gnu.org" Subject: Re: Any tips for debugging a GNAT tasking implementation problem? References: <4ABC2F40.7020905@gmail.com> <1253893711.18435.200.camel@localhost> <1253894712.18435.201.camel@localhost> In-Reply-To: <1253894712.18435.201.camel@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2009-09/txt/msg00549.txt.bz2 Laurent GUERBY wrote: > On Fri, 2009-09-25 at 17:48 +0200, Laurent GUERBY wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I'd say from the symptoms tasking doesn't work at all, could you try >> with a simpler testcase: >> >> -- begin tt.adb That works ok: > $ ./tt.exe > task > main > > $ But there are clearly substantial problems in that area; since writing the tests completed, there are a number of ch.9 failures. Perhaps one of them will cast more light on the underlying problem than the particular testcase I started investigating first. >> To my knowledge once "created" an Ada task will immediately start >> executing user program code with magic synchronization lock. > > with => without Thank you. I think then that it must be indicating some kind of failure of a task during early startup. I'll do some more digging. cheers, DaveK