From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12623 invoked by alias); 12 Oct 2009 14:22:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 12612 invoked by uid 22791); 12 Oct 2009 14:22:32 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-ew0-f221.google.com (HELO mail-ew0-f221.google.com) (209.85.219.221) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Oct 2009 14:22:29 +0000 Received: by ewy21 with SMTP id 21so8962376ewy.8 for ; Mon, 12 Oct 2009 07:22:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.211.161.39 with SMTP id n39mr7220927ebo.29.1255357346899; Mon, 12 Oct 2009 07:22:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from yakj.usersys.redhat.com (nat-pool-ams2-1.redhat.com [209.132.186.254]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 7sm427774eyg.11.2009.10.12.07.22.25 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 12 Oct 2009 07:22:25 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4AD33BA2.60107@gnu.org> Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 14:24:00 -0000 From: Paolo Bonzini User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.4pre) Gecko/20090922 Fedora/3.0-2.7.b4.fc11 Lightning/1.0pre Thunderbird/3.0b4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Joseph S. Myers" CC: Richard Guenther , gdr@integrable-solutions.net, Jason Merrill , gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: delete dead feature branches? References: <4ABD0F1E.5030807@redhat.com> <206fcf960909251214u5770c7b5o141614226e28fdff@mail.gmail.com> <84fc9c000909251220r62d518bka48cd3a13d0d5ea0@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2009-10/txt/msg00244.txt.bz2 On 09/25/2009 09:35 PM, Joseph S. Myers wrote: > Viewing deleted files and their history (and for SVN deleted branches are > just a special case of deleted files) is something SVN is bad at since you > do need to work out the last revision the file was present first. Yep. Anyone deleting dead branches should add a link to the last "live" version in branches.html. It seems easier to me to move them under branches/dead, and possibly create branches/merged. Paolo