From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-157488-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 9404 invoked by alias); 26 Oct 2009 19:57:56 -0000
Received: (qmail 9395 invoked by uid 22791); 26 Oct 2009 19:57:55 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.2 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from smtp-101-monday.nerim.net (HELO kraid.nerim.net) (62.4.16.101)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 26 Oct 2009 19:57:51 +0000
Received: from hector.lesours (ours.starynkevitch.net [213.41.244.95]) 	by kraid.nerim.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19BBECF162; 	Mon, 26 Oct 2009 20:57:48 +0100 (CET)
Received: from glinka.lesours ([192.168.0.1]) 	by hector.lesours with esmtp (Exim 4.69) 	(envelope-from <basile@starynkevitch.net>) 	id 1N2VhP-0004nP-Lp; Mon, 26 Oct 2009 20:57:51 +0100
Message-ID: <4AE5FF28.1050009@starynkevitch.net>
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 20:46:00 -0000
From: Basile STARYNKEVITCH <basile@starynkevitch.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla-Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (X11/20090701)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
CC: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph@codesourcery.com>,   GCC Mailing List <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: when (not) use bugzilla for GCC?
References: <4AE4998D.7040608@starynkevitch.net> 	<Pine.LNX.4.64.0910260154480.3671@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> 	<4AE54B94.3090708@starynkevitch.net> <mcrfx96s1b9.fsf@dhcp-172-17-9-151.mtv.corp.google.com>
In-Reply-To: <mcrfx96s1b9.fsf@dhcp-172-17-9-151.mtv.corp.google.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2009-10/txt/msg00534.txt.bz2

Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> Basile STARYNKEVITCH <basile@starynkevitch.net> writes:
> 
>> Did I understand correctly that GCC bugzilla treats magically the
>> *@gcc.gnu.org email adresses matching accounts usable for SVN write
>> access? This is great news!
> 
> Yes, that is how it works.


May I respectfully suggest to the person maintaining the bugzilla a 
notice in the login page saying something like:

GCC maintainers having write after approval (or better) access to the 
GCC trunk should preferably login with their XXXXX@gcc.gnu.org email

Regards.

-- 
Basile STARYNKEVITCH         http://starynkevitch.net/Basile/
email: basile<at>starynkevitch<dot>net mobile: +33 6 8501 2359
8, rue de la Faiencerie, 92340 Bourg La Reine, France
*** opinions {are only mines, sont seulement les miennes} ***