From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-157633-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 30605 invoked by alias); 3 Nov 2009 00:56:44 -0000
Received: (qmail 30597 invoked by uid 22791); 3 Nov 2009 00:56:43 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mail-ew0-f226.google.com (HELO mail-ew0-f226.google.com) (209.85.219.226)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 Nov 2009 00:56:39 +0000
Received: by ewy26 with SMTP id 26so5256615ewy.29         for <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>; Mon, 02 Nov 2009 16:56:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.216.86.11 with SMTP id v11mr5546783wee.220.1257209797357;         Mon, 02 Nov 2009 16:56:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?10.0.0.94? (cpe-76-173-26-187.socal.res.rr.com [76.173.26.187])         by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 7sm6141133eyb.40.2009.11.02.16.56.34         (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5);         Mon, 02 Nov 2009 16:56:36 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <4AEF7FCF.8000701@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2009 00:56:00 -0000
From: "Justin P. Mattock" <justinmattock@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Spicebird/0.7.1 (X11; 2009022519)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@gmail.com>
CC: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,   gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: cc1plus invoked oom-killer: gfp_mask=0x280da, order=0, oom_adj=0
References: <dd18b0c30911021329g3c99a783n6b0a293240c3312c@mail.gmail.com>	 <4AEF53F5.4020107@gmail.com> <dd18b0c30911021402t6c8b9cd4p2e5d5dcad732d0ac@mail.gmail.com> <4AEF57AC.4090704@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4AEF57AC.4090704@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2009-11/txt/msg00033.txt.bz2

Jiri Slaby wrote:
> On 11/02/2009 11:02 PM, Justin Mattock wrote:
>    
>> Now with this oom-killer I'm
>> hitting this on an imac9,1 with
>> gcc (GCC) 4.5.0 20091029 (experimental)
>>      
>
> So there is probably a leak in the gcc chain. Does this happen with a
> stable gcc version?
>
>    
o.k. I think it's something with the latest gcc(snapshot)
right now she's been compiling firefox for 45min
(then crapped out because I compiled nss without sqlite)
without no omm-killer.

Justin P. Mattock