From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-157873-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 9830 invoked by alias); 10 Nov 2009 06:18:50 -0000
Received: (qmail 9821 invoked by uid 22791); 10 Nov 2009 06:18:49 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mail-yw0-f203.google.com (HELO mail-yw0-f203.google.com) (209.85.211.203)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 Nov 2009 06:18:45 +0000
Received: by ywh41 with SMTP id 41so7133525ywh.0         for <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>; Mon, 09 Nov 2009 22:18:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.91.106.5 with SMTP id i5mr3024816agm.75.1257833923283;         Mon, 09 Nov 2009 22:18:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?10.0.0.94? (cpe-76-173-26-187.socal.res.rr.com [76.173.26.187])         by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 22sm226405yxe.3.2009.11.09.22.18.41         (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5);         Mon, 09 Nov 2009 22:18:42 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <4AF905DF.1090204@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 06:18:00 -0000
From: "Justin P. Mattock" <justinmattock@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Spicebird/0.7.1 (X11; 2009022519)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
CC: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: pure64 patch for 4.5.0
References: <4AF8CB85.5000201@gmail.com> <mcrocnalxh5.fsf@dhcp-172-17-9-151.mtv.corp.google.com>
In-Reply-To: <mcrocnalxh5.fsf@dhcp-172-17-9-151.mtv.corp.google.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2009-11/txt/msg00273.txt.bz2

Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> "Justin P. Mattock"<justinmattock@gmail.com>  writes:
>
>    
>> wanting to know if there's a pure64 patch for 4.5.0
>> right now I've plugged in a pure64 patch for 4.4.1
>> on 4.5.0.
>> will this be good or is there more to that needs to be added.
>> http://patches.cross-lfs.org/dev/gcc-4.4.1-pure64-1.patch
>>      
>
> You might do better to ask the people who wrote that patch.
>
> The patch does look generally plausible to me but I didn't really look
> at it in detail.
>
> Ian
>
>    
Cool thanks.
I can try that and see.
in any case it's probably better
to stick with a stable version.
(I just can't help it having
an  itch to try things out).

Justin P. Mattock